Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25017894›Full record

ReviewExperimental neurology2014

Non-mammalian model systems for studying neuro-immune interactions after spinal cord injury.

Ona Bloom

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental neurology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Pathophysiology and Therapeutic Approaches for Spinal Cord Injury.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Polymer-Based Scaffold Strategies for Spinal Cord Repair and Regeneration.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Astrocytes and microglia: Models and tools.The Journal of experimental medicine · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Spinal Cord Injury Scarring and Inflammation: Therapies Targeting Glial and Inflammatory Responses.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2018
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ona BloomThe Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, 350 Community Drive, Manhasset, NY 11030, USA; The Hofstra North Shore-LIJ School of Medicine, Hempstead Turnpike, Hempstead, NY 11549, USA. Electronic address: obloom@nshs.edu.
Feinstein Institute for Medical Research · US

Funding

Transcriptome analysis of a regenerating vertebrate spinal cord after injuryR03NS078519 · NINDS · FEINSTEIN INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH · PI BLOOM, ONA · 2012 to 2013
$165k
NINDS NIH HHS R03 NS078519NINDS NIH HHS R03NS078519
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mammals exhibit poor recovery after injury to the spinal cord, where the loss of neurons and neuronal connections can be functionally devastating. In contrast, it has long been appreciated that many non-mammalian vertebrate species exhibit significant spontaneous functional recovery after spinal cord injury (SCI). Identifying the biological responses that support an organism's inability or ability to recover function after SCI is an important scientific and medical question. While recent advances have been made in understanding the responses to SCI in mammals, we remain without an effective clinical therapy for SCI. A comparative biological approach to understanding responses to SCI in non-mammalian vertebrates will yield important insights into mechanisms that promote recovery after SCI. Presently, mechanistic studies aimed at elucidating responses, both intrinsic and extrinsic to neurons, that result in different regenerative capacities after SCI across vertebrates are just in their early stages. There are several inhibitory mechanisms proposed to impede recovery from SCI in mammals, including reactive gliosis and scarring, myelin associated proteins, and a suboptimal immune response. One hypothesis to explain the robust regenerative capacity of several non-mammalian vertebrates is a lack of some or all of these inhibitory signals. This review presents the current knowledge of immune responses to SCI in several non-mammalian species that achieve anatomical and functional recovery after SCI. This subject is of growing interest, as studies increasingly show both beneficial and detrimental roles of the immune response following SCI in mammals. A long-term goal of biomedical research in all experimental models of SCI is to understand how to promote functional recovery after SCI in humans. Therefore, understanding immune responses to SCI in non-mammalian vertebrates that achieve functional recovery spontaneously may identify novel strategies to modulate immune responses in less regenerative species and promote recovery after SCI.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsHumansNeuroimmunomodulationPhylogenySpinal Cord InjuriesSpinal Cord RegenerationImmune systemInflammationRegenerationSpinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID25017894
PMCPMC4099969
OpenAlexW1965677140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.