ReviewExperimental neurology2014
Non-mammalian model systems for studying neuro-immune interactions after spinal cord injury.
Review in Experimental neurology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Modeling Release Scaffolds for Spinal Cord Tissue Regeneration After Injury Using COMSOL Simulation.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- TGF-β-induced fibrotic scar formation limits recovery of spinal cord injury.Bone research · 2026Article
- Animal Models of Spinal Cord Injury.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Pathophysiology and Therapeutic Approaches for Spinal Cord Injury.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Activating Transcription Factor 3 (ATF3) is a Highly Conserved Pro-regenerative Transcription Factor in the Vertebrate Nervous System.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Review
- Review
- Survival and Axonal Outgrowth of the Mauthner Cell Following Spinal Cord Crush Does Not Drive Post-injury Startle Responses.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Article
- Polymer-Based Scaffold Strategies for Spinal Cord Repair and Regeneration.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Review
- Blocking Notch signal pathway suppresses the activation of neurotoxic A1 astrocytes after spinal cord injury.Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.) · 2019Article
- Effect of M2 macrophage adoptive transfer on transcriptome profile of injured spinal cords in rats.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2019Article
- Astrocytes and microglia: Models and tools.The Journal of experimental medicine · 2019Review
- Regenerative capacity in the lamprey spinal cord is not altered after a repeated transection.PloS one · 2019Article
- Spinal Cord Injury Scarring and Inflammation: Therapies Targeting Glial and Inflammatory Responses.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2018Review
- Neuroinflammation as Fuel for Axonal Regeneration in the Injured Vertebrate Central Nervous System.Mediators of inflammation · 2017Review
- Elusive roles for reactive astrocytes in neurodegenerative diseases.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2015Review
- Adipose tissue derived stem cell secretome induces motor and histological gains after complete spinal cord injury inJournal of tissue engineeringArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Mammals exhibit poor recovery after injury to the spinal cord, where the loss of neurons and neuronal connections can be functionally devastating. In contrast, it has long been appreciated that many non-mammalian vertebrate species exhibit significant spontaneous functional recovery after spinal cord injury (SCI). Identifying the biological responses that support an organism's inability or ability to recover function after SCI is an important scientific and medical question. While recent advances have been made in understanding the responses to SCI in mammals, we remain without an effective clinical therapy for SCI. A comparative biological approach to understanding responses to SCI in non-mammalian vertebrates will yield important insights into mechanisms that promote recovery after SCI. Presently, mechanistic studies aimed at elucidating responses, both intrinsic and extrinsic to neurons, that result in different regenerative capacities after SCI across vertebrates are just in their early stages. There are several inhibitory mechanisms proposed to impede recovery from SCI in mammals, including reactive gliosis and scarring, myelin associated proteins, and a suboptimal immune response. One hypothesis to explain the robust regenerative capacity of several non-mammalian vertebrates is a lack of some or all of these inhibitory signals. This review presents the current knowledge of immune responses to SCI in several non-mammalian species that achieve anatomical and functional recovery after SCI. This subject is of growing interest, as studies increasingly show both beneficial and detrimental roles of the immune response following SCI in mammals. A long-term goal of biomedical research in all experimental models of SCI is to understand how to promote functional recovery after SCI in humans. Therefore, understanding immune responses to SCI in non-mammalian vertebrates that achieve functional recovery spontaneously may identify novel strategies to modulate immune responses in less regenerative species and promote recovery after SCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.