Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25017105›Full record

ArticleNature genetics2014

Integrating mapping-, assembly- and haplotype-based approaches for calling variants in clinical sequencing applications.

Andy Rimmer, Hang Phan, Iain Mathieson, Zamin Iqbal, Stephen R F Twigg, WGS500 Consortium, Andrew O M Wilkie, Gil McVean, Gerton Lunter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 654 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
654citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

654 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Prognostic Markers of DNA Methylation and Next-Generation Sequencing in Progressive Glioblastoma from the EORTC-26101 Trial.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2023
    Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

594 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Andy Rimmer *Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Hang Phan *Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Iain MathiesonWellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Zamin IqbalWellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Stephen R F TwiggWeatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford, UK.
WGS500 Consortium
Andrew O M WilkieWeatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford, UK.
Gil McVeanWellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Gerton LunterWellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I02593X/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 089250/Z/09/ZWellcome Trust 090532/Z/09/ZWellcome Trust 102731/Z/13/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-throughput DNA sequencing technology has transformed genetic research and is starting to make an impact on clinical practice. However, analyzing high-throughput sequencing data remains challenging, particularly in clinical settings where accuracy and turnaround times are critical. We present a new approach to this problem, implemented in a software package called Platypus. Platypus achieves high sensitivity and specificity for SNPs, indels and complex polymorphisms by using local de novo assembly to generate candidate variants, followed by local realignment and probabilistic haplotype estimation. It is an order of magnitude faster than existing tools and generates calls from raw aligned read data without preprocessing. We demonstrate the performance of Platypus in clinically relevant experimental designs by comparing with SAMtools and GATK on whole-genome and exome-capture data, by identifying de novo variation in 15 parent-offspring trios with high sensitivity and specificity, and by estimating human leukocyte antigen genotypes directly from variant calls.

Indexed as

Genomic Structural VariationAlgorithmsChromosome MappingExomeGenome, HumanGenotypeHaplotypesHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHLA AntigensHumansMutationPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSensitivity and SpecificitySequence Analysis, DNASoftwareHLA Antigens

Identifiers

PMID25017105
PMCPMC4753679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.