Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25016586›Full record

ArticleJournal of contaminant hydrology2014

The impact of biostimulation on the fate of sulfate and associated sulfur dynamics in groundwater.

Ziheng Miao, Concepcion Carreón-Diazconti, Kenneth C Carroll, Mark L Brusseau

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of contaminant hydrology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ziheng MiaoDepartment of Soil, Water and Environmental Science, University of Arizona, 429 Shantz Building #38, P.O. Box 210038, Tucson, AZ, USA; Department of Hydrology and Water Resources, University of Arizona, Harshbarger Building #11, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Concepcion Carreón-DiazcontiEngineering Institute, Autonomous University of Baja California, Mexicali, Baja California, Mexico.
Kenneth C CarrollNew Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, USA.
Mark L BrusseauDepartment of Soil, Water and Environmental Science, University of Arizona, 429 Shantz Building #38, P.O. Box 210038, Tucson, AZ, USA; Department of Hydrology and Water Resources, University of Arizona, Harshbarger Building #11, Tucson, AZ, USA. Electronic address: brusseau@email.arizona.edu.
University of Arizona · USNew Mexico State University · USUniversidad Autónoma de Baja California · MX

Funding

TRANSPORT OF TRACE METALS IN A POLLUTED AQUIFERP42ES004940 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI Bernardo Lemos · 1990 to 2026
$68.1M
NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES004940NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES04940
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The impact of electron-donor addition on sulfur dynamics for a groundwater system with low levels of metal contaminants was evaluated with a pilot-scale biostimulation test conducted at a former uranium mining site. Geochemical and stable-isotope data collected before, during, and after the test were analyzed to evaluate the sustainability of sulfate reducing conditions induced by the test, the fate of hydrogen sulfide, and the impact on aqueous geochemical conditions. The results of site characterization activities conducted prior to the test indicated the absence of measurable bacterial sulfate reduction. The injection of an electron donor (ethanol) induced bacterial sulfate reduction, as confirmed by an exponential decrease of sulfate concentration in concert with changes in oxidation-reduction potential, redox species, alkalinity, production of hydrogen sulfide, and fractionation of δ(34)S-sulfate. High, stoichiometrically-equivalent hydrogen sulfide concentrations were not observed until several months after the start of the test. It is hypothesized that hydrogen sulfide produced from sulfate reduction was initially sequestered in the form of iron sulfides until the exhaustion of readily reducible iron oxides within the sediment. The fractionation of δ(34)S for sulfate was atypical, wherein the enrichment declined in the latter half of the experiment. It was conjectured that mixing effects associated with the release of sulfate from sulfate minerals associated with the sediments, along with possible sulfide re-oxidation contributed to this behavior. The results of this study illustrate the biogeochemical complexity that is associated with in-situ biostimulation processes involving bacterial sulfate reduction.

Indexed as

ArizonaBiodegradation, EnvironmentalGroundwaterIronIron CompoundsMiningSulfatesSulfur CompoundsSulfur IsotopesUraniumWater Pollutants, ChemicalIronIron CompoundsSulfatesSulfur CompoundsSulfur IsotopesUraniumWater Pollutants, ChemicalIron sulfide precipitationIsotopic fractionationStable isotopesSulfate mineral dissolutionSulfate reductionSulfide re-oxidation

Identifiers

PMID25016586
PMCPMC4136432
OpenAlexW2028200606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.