ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2014
Modular evolution of DNA-binding preference of a Tbrain transcription factor provides a mechanism for modifying gene regulatory networks.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Escaping Constraints to Innovate: Maternal Neofunctionalization in a HoxB4 Duplicate.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2026Article
- Transcription of microRNAs is regulated by developmental signaling pathways and transcription factors.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024Article
- Regeneration of the larval sea star nervous system by wounding induced respecification to the Sox2 lineage.eLife · 2022Article
- Cell type phylogenetics informs the evolutionary origin of echinoderm larval skeletogenic cell identity.Communications biology · 2019Article
- Conservation of DNA and ligand binding properties of retinoid X receptor from the placozoan Trichoplax adhaerens to human.The Journal of steroid biochemistry and molecular biology · 2018Review
- From genome to anatomy: The architecture and evolution of the skeletogenic gene regulatory network of sea urchins and other echinoderms.Genesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000) · 2018Review
- Genome-wide use of high- and low-affinity Tbrain transcription factor binding sites during echinoderm development.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017Article
- Article
- De novo ChIP-seq analysis.Genome biology · 2015Article
- Identification of Lineage-Specific Cis-Regulatory Modules Associated with Variation in Transcription Factor Binding and Chromatin Activity Using Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Models.Molecular biology and evolution · 2015Article
- Caenorhabditis elegans TBX-2 Directly Regulates Its Own Expression in a Negative Autoregulatory Loop.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2015Article
- Unraveling the Tangled Skein: The Evolution of Transcriptional Regulatory Networks in Development.Annual review of genomics and human genetics · 2015Review
- UniPROBE, update 2015: new tools and content for the online database of protein-binding microarray data on protein-DNA interactions.Nucleic acids research · 2015Article
- Evolution of transcription factor function as a mechanism for changing metazoan developmental gene regulatory networks.EvoDevo · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Gene regulatory networks (GRNs) describe the progression of transcriptional states that take a single-celled zygote to a multicellular organism. It is well documented that GRNs can evolve extensively through mutations to cis-regulatory modules (CRMs). Transcription factor proteins that bind these CRMs may also evolve to produce novelty. Coding changes are considered to be rarer, however, because transcription factors are multifunctional and hence are more constrained to evolve in ways that will not produce widespread detrimental effects. Recent technological advances have unearthed a surprising variation in DNA-binding abilities, such that individual transcription factors may recognize both a preferred primary motif and an additional secondary motif. This provides a source of modularity in function. Here, we demonstrate that orthologous transcription factors can also evolve a changed preference for a secondary binding motif, thereby offering an unexplored mechanism for GRN evolution. Using protein-binding microarray, surface plasmon resonance, and in vivo reporter assays, we demonstrate an important difference in DNA-binding preference between Tbrain protein orthologs in two species of echinoderms, the sea star, Patiria miniata, and the sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus purpuratus. Although both orthologs recognize the same primary motif, only the sea star Tbr also has a secondary binding motif. Our in vivo assays demonstrate that this difference may allow for greater evolutionary change in timing of regulatory control. This uncovers a layer of transcription factor binding divergence that could exist for many pairs of orthologs. We hypothesize that this divergence provides modularity that allows orthologous transcription factors to evolve novel roles in GRNs through modification of binding to secondary sites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.