Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25016527›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2014

Genome-wide analysis of genetic and epigenetic control of programmed DNA deletion.

Estienne C Swart, Cyril Denby Wilkes, Pamela Y Sandoval, Miroslav Arambasic, Linda Sperling, Mariusz Nowacki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A PIWI protein-dependent DNA N6-adenine methylation pathway inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. MITE infestation accommodated by genome editing in the germline genome of the ciliateProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Programmed genome rearrangements in ciliates.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2020
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Evolutionary origins and impacts of genome architecture in ciliates.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Estienne C SwartInstitute of Cell Biology, University of Bern, Baltzerstrasse 4, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.
Cyril Denby WilkesCNRS UPR3404 Centre de Génétique Moléculaire, 1 avenue de la Terrasse, Gif-sur-Yvette F-91198 cedex, France Université Paris-Sud, Département de Biologie, Orsay, F-91405, France.
Pamela Y SandovalInstitute of Cell Biology, University of Bern, Baltzerstrasse 4, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.
Miroslav ArambasicInstitute of Cell Biology, University of Bern, Baltzerstrasse 4, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.
Linda SperlingCNRS UPR3404 Centre de Génétique Moléculaire, 1 avenue de la Terrasse, Gif-sur-Yvette F-91198 cedex, France Université Paris-Sud, Département de Biologie, Orsay, F-91405, France.
Mariusz NowackiInstitute of Cell Biology, University of Bern, Baltzerstrasse 4, 3012 Bern, Switzerland mariusz.nowacki@izb.unibe.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the development of the somatic genome from the Paramecium germline genome the bulk of the copies of ∼45 000 unique, internal eliminated sequences (IESs) are deleted. IES targeting is facilitated by two small RNA (sRNA) classes: scnRNAs, which relay epigenetic information from the parental nucleus to the developing nucleus, and iesRNAs, which are produced and used in the developing nucleus. Why only certain IESs require sRNAs for their removal has been enigmatic. By analyzing the silencing effects of three genes: PGM (responsible for DNA excision), DCL2/3 (scnRNA production) and DCL5 (iesRNA production), we identify key properties required for IES elimination. Based on these results, we propose that, depending on the exact combination of their lengths and end bases, some IESs are less efficiently recognized or excised and have a greater requirement for targeting by scnRNAs and iesRNAs. We suggest that the variation in IES retention following silencing of DCL2/3 is not primarily due to scnRNA density, which is comparatively uniform relative to IES retention, but rather the genetic properties of IESs. Taken together, our analyses demonstrate that in Paramecium the underlying genetic properties of developmentally deleted DNA sequences are essential in determining the sensitivity of these sequences to epigenetic control.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticSequence DeletionBase SequenceDNA, ProtozoanGene SilencingGenome, ProtozoanParameciumRibonuclease IIIRNA, Small InterferingRNA, Small UntranslatedDNA, ProtozoanRibonuclease IIIRNA, Small InterferingRNA, Small Untranslated

Identifiers

PMID25016527
PMCPMC4132734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.