Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25016297›Full record

ReviewSeminars in cell & developmental biology2014

Making models match measurements: model optimization for morphogen patterning networks.

J B Hengenius, M Gribskov, A E Rundell, D M Umulis

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in cell & developmental biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J B HengeniusDepartment of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, 247 S. Martin Jischke Drive, West Lafayette, IN 47907, United States.
M GribskovDepartment of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, 247 S. Martin Jischke Drive, West Lafayette, IN 47907, United States.
A E RundellWeldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, 206 S. Martin Jischke Drive, West Lafayette, IN 47907, United States.
D M UmulisWeldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, 206 S. Martin Jischke Drive, West Lafayette, IN 47907, United States; Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Purdue University, 225 S. University Street, West Lafayette, IN 47907, United States. Electronic address: dumulis@purdue.edu.
Purdue University West Lafayette · US

Funding

Systems Analysis of BMP Regulation in Developing Zebrafish EmbryosR01HD073156 · NICHD · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI UMULIS, DAVID MICHAEL · 2013 to 2017
$1.5M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD073156
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mathematical modeling of developmental signaling networks has played an increasingly important role in the identification of regulatory mechanisms by providing a sandbox for hypothesis testing and experiment design. Whether these models consist of an equation with a few parameters or dozens of equations with hundreds of parameters, a prerequisite to model-based discovery is to bring simulated behavior into agreement with observed data via parameter estimation. These parameters provide insight into the system (e.g., enzymatic rate constants describe enzyme properties). Depending on the nature of the model fit desired - from qualitative (relative spatial positions of phosphorylation) to quantitative (exact agreement of spatial position and concentration of gene products) - different measures of data-model mismatch are used to estimate different parameter values, which contain different levels of usable information and/or uncertainty. To facilitate the adoption of modeling as a tool for discovery alongside other tools such as genetics, immunostaining, and biochemistry, careful consideration needs to be given to how well a model fits the available data, what the optimized parameter values mean in a biological context, and how the uncertainty in model parameters and predictions plays into experiment design. The core discussion herein pertains to the quantification of model-to-data agreement, which constitutes the first measure of a model's performance and future utility to the problem at hand. Integration of this experimental data and the appropriate choice of objective measures of data-model agreement will continue to drive modeling forward as a tool that contributes to experimental discovery. The Drosophila melanogaster gap gene system, in which model parameters are optimized against in situ immunofluorescence intensities, demonstrates the importance of error quantification, which is applicable to a wide array of developmental modeling studies.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticAlgorithmsAnimalsComputer SimulationDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalHomeodomain ProteinsMorphogenesisSignal TransductionTrans-Activatorsbcd protein, DrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsHomeodomain ProteinsTrans-ActivatorsDevelopmental biologyDynamic modelingMathematical modelingMorphogensObjective functionsParameter estimation

Identifiers

PMID25016297
PMCPMC4378650
OpenAlexW1998219322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.