Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25016279›Full record

ArticleActa biomaterialia2014

Characterization of living skin using multi-view stereo and isogeometric analysis.

Adrián Buganza Tepole, Michael Gart, Arun K Gosain, Ellen Kuhl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta biomaterialia, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Personalized Computational Models of Tissue-Rearrangement in the Scalp Predict the Mechanical Stress Signature of Rotation Flaps.The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Mathematical and computational modelling of skin biophysics: a review.Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2017
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Isogeometric Kirchhoff-Love shell formulations for biological membranes.Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering · 2015
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Adrián Buganza TepoleDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Michael GartDivision of Pediatric Plastic Surgery, Lurie Children's Hospital of Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
Arun K GosainDivision of Pediatric Plastic Surgery, Lurie Children's Hospital of Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
Ellen KuhlDepartments of Mechanical Engineering, Bioengineering, and Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. Electronic address: ekuhl@stanford.edu.
Stanford University · USLurie Children's Hospital · USNorthwestern University · US

Funding

Physics-based Simulation of Biological Structures(RMI)U54GM072970 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ALTMAN, RUSS BIAGIO · 2004 to 2013
$33.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM072970NIGMS NIH HHS U54GM072970
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skin is our interface with the outside world. In its natural environment, it displays unique mechanical characteristics, such as prestretch and growth. While there is a general agreement on the physiological importance of these features, they remain poorly characterized, mainly because they are difficult to access with standard laboratory techniques. Here we present a new, inexpensive technique to characterize living skin using multi-view stereo and isogeometric analysis. Based on easy-to-create hand-held camera images, we quantify prestretch, deformation and growth in a controlled porcine model of chronic skin expansion. Over a period of 5 weeks, we gradually inflate an implanted tissue expander, take weekly photographs of the experimental scene, reconstruct the geometry from a tattooed surface grid and create parametric representations of the skin surface. After 5 weeks of expansion, our method reveals an average area prestretch of 1.44, an average area stretch of 1.87 and an average area growth of 2.25. Area prestretch is maximal in the ventral region with a value of 2.37, whereas area stretch and area growth are maximal above the center of the expander, with values of 4.05 and 4.81, respectively. Our study has immediate impact on understanding living skin to optimize treatment planning and decision making in plastic and reconstructive surgery. Beyond these direct implications, our experimental design has broad applications in clinical research and basic sciences: it serves as a simple, robust, low cost, easy-to-use tool to reconstruct living membranes, which are difficult to characterize in a conventional laboratory setup.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaSkinSwineSwine, MiniatureGrowthIsogeometric analysisMulti-view stereoPrestretchSkin

Identifiers

PMID25016279
PMCPMC4186913
OpenAlexW2147645098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.