Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25015897›Full record

ArticleAge and ageing2014

Self-reported quality of care for older adults from 2004 to 2011: a cohort study.

Nick Steel, Antonia C Hardcastle, Allan Clark, Luke T A Mounce, Max O Bachmann, Suzanne H Richards, William E Henley, John L Campbell, David Melzer

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Age and ageing, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03786315 (Exploring 'VOLITION' in Context - a Study to Inform the Implementation of a New Intervention), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03786315 completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Exploring 'VOLITION' in Context - a Study to Inform the Implementation of a New Intervention

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of ExeterRan2021 to 2022Enrolled72ConditionsDecision Making, Aged, Multimorbidity, General Practice
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Primary care supply and quality of care in England.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2018
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nick SteelNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, UK.
Antonia C HardcastleNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, UK.
Allan ClarkNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, UK.
Luke T A MouncePrimary Care Research Group, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, Devon, UK.
Max O BachmannNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, UK.
Suzanne H RichardsPrimary Care Research Group, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, Devon, UK.
William E HenleyHealth Statistics Group, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, Devon, UK.
John L CampbellPrimary Care Research Group, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, Devon, UK.
David MelzerEpidemiology and Public Health, University of Exeter Medical School, Barrack Road, Exeter, Devon, UK.

Funding

Project-001R01AG017644 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF LONDON INST OF NEUROLOGY · PI Andrew Steptoe · 2000 to 2026
$56.2M
Department of Health 10/2002/06NIA NIH HHS R01 AG017644
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundlittle is known about changes in the quality of medical care for older adults over time.

objectiveto assess changes in technical quality of care over 6 years, and associations with participants' characteristics.

designa national cohort survey covering RAND Corporation-derived quality indicators (QIs) in face-to-face structured interviews in participants' households.

participantsa total of 5,114 people aged 50 or more in four waves of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing.

methodsthe percentage achievement of 24 QIs in 10 general medical and geriatric clinical conditions was calculated for each time point, and associations with participants' characteristics were estimated using logistic regression.

resultsparticipants were eligible for 21,220 QIs. QI achievement for geriatric conditions (cataract, falls, osteoarthritis and osteoporosis) was 41% [95% confidence interval (CI): 38-44] in 2004-05 and 38% (36-39) in 2010-11. Achievement for general medical conditions (depression, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, ischaemic heart disease, pain and cerebrovascular disease) improved from 75% (73-77) in 2004-05 to 80% (79-82) in 2010-11. Achievement ranged from 89% for cerebrovascular disease to 34% for osteoarthritis. Overall achievement was lower for participants who were men, wealthier, infrequent alcohol drinkers, not obese and living alone.

conclusionsubstantial system-level shortfalls in quality of care for geriatric conditions persisted over 6 years, with relatively small and inconsistent variations in quality by participants' characteristics. The relative lack of variation by participants' characteristics suggests that quality improvement interventions may be more effective when directed at healthcare delivery systems rather than individuals.

Indexed as

Self ReportAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAgingChi-Square DistributionDelivery of Health CareEnglandFemaleHealth Care SurveysHealth Services for the AgedHumansLogistic ModelsLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle Agedepidemiologygeriatricsolder peoplequality of care

Identifiers

PMID25015897
PMCPMC4143491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.