Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25015483›Full record

ReviewHandbook of clinical neurology2014

Laboratory diagnosis of viral infection.

David R Peaper, Marie Louise Landry

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Handbook of clinical neurology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Recent advances in point of care testing for COVID-19 detection.Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie · 2022
    Review
  9. Laboratory Diagnosis for SARS-CoV-2 Infection.Infectious disease clinics of North America · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Zika virus serological diagnosis: commercial tests and monoclonal antibodies as tools.The journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases · 2020
    Review
  13. TemporalACS omega · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Virological and Immunological Outcomes of Coinfections.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

David R PeaperDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; Virology Reference Laboratory, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA.
Marie Louise LandryDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA. Electronic address: marie.landry@yale.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Laboratories, HospitalHumansVirus Diseasesimmunoassaysnucleic acid amplificationPCRviral diagnosisvirus infectionvirus isolation

Identifiers

PMID25015483
PMCPMC7151872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.