Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25014995›Full record

Trial reportBMC cancer2014

The electronic self report assessment and intervention for cancer: promoting patient verbal reporting of symptom and quality of life issues in a randomized controlled trial.

Donna L Berry, Fangxin Hong, Barbara Halpenny, Anne Partridge, Erica Fox, Jesse R Fann, Seth Wolpin, William B Lober, Nigel Bush, Upendra Parvathaneni and 2 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 38 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00852852 nacompletednot on this map

Computerized Assessment for Patients With Cancer-ESRA-C II

TypeinterventionalSponsorDana-Farber Cancer InstituteRan2008 to 2013Enrolled779ConditionsCancerArmsElectronic Self-Report Assessment - Cancer (ESRA-C)
NCT04221789 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

TB Treatment Support Tools: Refinement and Evaluation of an Interactive Mobile App and Direct Adherence Monitoring on TB Treatment Outcomes

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstitute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health PolicyRan2020 to 2025Enrolled555ConditionsTuberculosis, Treatment AdherenceArmsTB treatment assistant
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Patient-reported outcome use in oncology: a systematic review of the impact on patient-clinician communication.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Development and evaluation of the Cancer Symptom Management System: Symptom Management Improves your LifE (SMILE)-a randomized controlled trial.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Exploring Patients' Understanding of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Donna L BerryDepartment of Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Systems, University of Washington, Box 357366, Seattle, WA 98195-7366, USA. donnalb@uw.edu.
Fangxin Hong
Barbara Halpenny
Anne Partridge
Erica Fox
Jesse R Fann
Seth Wolpin
William B Lober
Nigel Bush
Upendra Parvathaneni
Dagmar Amtmann
Rosemary Ford
Harvard University · USUniversity of Washington · USSeattle Cancer Care Alliance · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USNeurobehavioral Systems · USUnited States Department of Defense · USUniversity of Washington Medical Center · US

Funding

Computerized Assessment for Patients with Cancer: ESRA-C IIR01NR008726 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BERRY, DONNA L. · 2004 to 2009
$3.4M
NINR NIH HHS 2R01 NR008726
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe electronic self report assessment - cancer (ESRA-C), has been shown to reduce symptom distress during cancer therapy The purpose of this analysis was to evaluate aspects of how the ESRA-C intervention may have resulted in lower symptom distress (SD).

methodsPatients at two cancer centers were randomized to ESRA-C assessment only (control) or the Web-based ESRA-C intervention delivered to patients' homes or to a tablet in clinic. The intervention allowed patients to self-monitor symptom and quality of life (SxQOL) between visits, receive self-care education and coaching to report SxQOL to clinicians. Summaries of assessments were delivered to clinicians in both groups. Audio-recordings of clinic visits made 6 weeks after treatment initiation were coded for discussions of 26 SxQOL issues, focusing on patients'/caregivers' coached verbal reports of SxQOL severity, pattern, alleviating/aggravating factors and requests for help. Among issues identified as problematic, two measures were defined for each patient: the percent SxQOL reported that included a coached statement, and an index of verbalized coached statements per SxQOL. The Wilcoxon rank test was used to compare measures between groups. Clinician responses to problematic SxQOL were compared. A mediation analysis was conducted, exploring the effect of verbal reports on SD outcomes.

results517 (256 intervention) clinic visits were audio-recorded. General discussion of problematic SxQOL was similar in both groups. Control group patients reported a median 75% of problematic SxQOL using any specific coached statement compared to a median 85% in the intervention group (p = .0009). The median report index of coached statements was 0.25 for the control group and 0.31 for the intervention group (p = 0.008). Fatigue, pain and physical function issues were reported significantly more often in the intervention group (all p < .05). Clinicians' verbalized responses did not differ between groups. Patients' verbal reports did not mediate final SD outcomes (p = .41).

conclusionsAdding electronically-delivered, self-care instructions and communication coaching to ESRA-C promoted specific patient descriptions of problematic SxQOL issues compared with ESRA-C assessment alone. However, clinician verbal responses were no different and subsequent symptom distress group differences were not mediated by the patients' reports.

trial registrationNCT00852852; 26 Feb 2009.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeSelf ReportAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansInternetMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPatient-Centered CarePatient Education as TopicSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID25014995
PMCPMC4226951
OpenAlexW2129196314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.