Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25014510›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Gender differences in survival and the use of primary care prior to diagnosis of three cancers: an analysis of routinely collected UK general practice data.

Yingying Wang, Nick Freemantle, Irwin Nazareth, Kate Hunt

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Epidemiology of Different Types of Cancers Reported in Basra, Iraq.Sultan Qaboos University medical journal · 2020
    Observational
  16. Article
  17. International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Nurse Practitioners and Men's Primary Health Care.American journal of men's health · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yingying WangMRC|CSO Social & Public Health Science Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Nick FreemantleDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Irwin NazarethDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Kate HuntMRC|CSO Social & Public Health Science Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
University College London · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U130059811Medical Research Council MC_UU_12017/3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore whether there are gender differences in the number of GP recorded cases, the probability of survival and consulting pattern prior to diagnosis amongst patients with three non-sex-specific cancers.

designCross sectional study.

settingUK primary care. SUBJECTS: 12,189 patients aged 16 years or over diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC), 11,081 patients with lung cancer and 4,352 patients with malignant melanoma, with first record of cancer diagnosis during 1997-2006.

main outcome measuresCancer cases recorded in primary care; probability of survival following diagnosis; and number of GP contacts within the 24 months preceding diagnosis.

resultsFrom 1997-2006, overall rates of GP recorded CRC and lung cancer cases recorded were higher in men than in women, but rates of malignant melanoma were higher in women than in men. Gender differences in survival were small; 49% of men and 53% of women survived at least 5 years following CRC diagnosis; 9% of men and 12% of women with lung cancer, and 77% of men and 86% of women with malignant melanoma. The adjusted male to female relative hazard ratio of death in all patients was 1.20 (95%CI 1.13-1.30), 1.24 (95%CI 1.16-1.33) and 1.73 (95%CI 1.51-2.00) for CRC, lung cancer and malignant melanoma respectively. However, gender differences in the relative risk were much smaller amongst those who died during follow-up. For each cancer, there was little evidence of gender difference in the percentage who consulted and the number of GP contacts made within 24 months prior to diagnosis.

conclusionsThis study found that patterns of consulting prior to cancer diagnosis differed little between two genders, providing no support for the hypothesis that gender differences in survival are explained by gender differences in consultation for more serious illness, and suggests the need for a more critical view of gender and consultation.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overColorectal NeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesFamily PracticeFemaleGeneral PracticeHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareSex Factors

Identifiers

PMID25014510
PMCPMC4094390
OpenAlexW2051051561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.