ArticleVision research2014
Size or spacing: which limits letter recognition in people with age-related macular degeneration?
Article in Vision research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development of Crowding Distance in Children Is Faster and Later Than Visual Acuity and Better Predicts Reading Performance.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Elevated Visual Crowding in CRB1-Associated Retinopathies: Understanding Functional Visual Deficits Using Child-Friendly Computerized Testing.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
- Video-evoked neuromarkers of visual function in age-related macular degeneration.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
- Cortical distance unifies the extent of parafoveal contour interactions.Journal of vision · 2022Article
- The generality of the critical spacing for crowded optotypes: From Bouma to the 21st century.Journal of vision · 2021Article
- Age factor affects reading acuity and reading speed in attaining text information.International journal of ophthalmology · 2019Article
- Korean reading speed: Effects of print size and retinal eccentricity.Vision research · 2018Article
- Foveal Crowding Resolved.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Stimulus conflation and tuning selectivity in V4 neurons: a model of visual crowding.Journal of vision · 2018Article
- Object crowding in age-related macular degeneration.Journal of vision · 2017Article
- Crowding in the S-cone pathway.Vision research · 2016Article
- Spatio-temporal properties of letter crowding.Journal of vision · 2016Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Recent evidence suggests a double dissociation of size and spacing limit on letter recognition-it is limited by size in the fovea and critical spacing in the normal periphery. Here, we evaluated whether size or spacing limits letter recognition in people with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) who must use their peripheral vision. We measured the size threshold for recognizing lowercase letters presented alone, or flanked by two letters at various center-to-center nominal letter spacings (multiples of letter size) for 11 observers with AMD. For comparison, similar measurements were obtained at 5° and 10° eccentricity in the nasal and lower visual fields in three older adults with normal vision. Single-letter size thresholds were worse for observers with AMD than at comparable retinal locations in the normal periphery. For flanked letters, size threshold improved with larger nominal spacing up to the critical spacing, beyond which size threshold was unaffected by the flankers. Seven AMD observers had a nominal critical spacing between 1.25× and 1.80×, values close to those in the normal fovea, suggesting that their letter recognition is size-limited; two had a nominal critical spacing of 3-4×, values close to those in the normal periphery, implying that their letter recognition is limited by spacing; and another two had a nominal critical spacing of ∼2.3×, implying that their letter recognition is limited by both size and spacing. The wide range of nominal critical spacings observed in our AMD observers may reflect the degree of completeness of their adaptation process to vision loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.