ArticleIET systems biology2014
Discovery of significant pathways in breast cancer metastasis via module extraction and comparison.
Article in IET systems biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Extracellular Vesicles in Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma: Characterization and Diagnostic Potential.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Identification of Potential Prognostic Biomarkers for Breast Cancer Based on lncRNA-TF-Associated ceRNA Network and Functional Module.BioMed research international · 2020Article
- Article
- Mining conditions specific hub genes from RNA-Seq gene-expression data via biclustering and their application to drug discovery.IET systems biology · 2019Article
- Co-expression of key gene modules and pathways of human breast cancer cell lines.Bioscience reports · 2019Article
- Application of a co‑expression network for the analysis of aggressive and non‑aggressive breast cancer cell lines to predict the clinical outcome of patients.Molecular medicine reports · 2017Article
- Disease biomarker identification from gene network modules for metastasized breast cancer.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Identifying network biomarkers based on protein-protein interactions and expression data.BMC medical genomics · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Discovering significant pathways rather than single genes or small gene sets involved in metastasis is becoming more and more important in the study of breast cancer. Many researches have shed light on this problem. However, most of the existing works are relying on some priori biological information, which may bring bias to the models. The authors propose a new method that detects metastasis-related pathways by identifying and comparing modules in metastasis and non-metastasis gene co-expression networks. The gene co-expression networks are built by Pearson correlation coefficients, and then the modules inferred in these two networks are compared. In metastasis and non-metastasis networks, 36 and 41 significant modules are identified. Also, 27.8% (metastasis) and 29.3% (non-metastasis) of the modules are enriched significantly for one or several pathways with p-value <0.05. Many breast cancer genes including RB1, CCND1 and TP53 are included in these identified pathways. Five significant pathways are discovered only in metastasis network: glycolysis pathway, cell adhesion molecules, focal adhesion, stathmin and breast cancer resistance to antimicrotubule agents, and cytosolic DNA-sensing pathway. The first three pathways have been proved to be closely associated with metastasis. The rest two can be taken as a guide for future research in breast cancer metastasis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.