Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25013408›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical research2014

Drainage vs. non-drainage after cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a retrospective study.

Mohammed A Bawahab, Walid M Abd El Maksoud, Saeed A Alsareii, Fahad S Al Amri, Hala F Ali, Abdul Rahman Nimeri, Abdul Rahman M Al Amri, Adel A Assiri, Mohammed I Abdul Aziz

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07195643 (Predictive Factors of Drain Insertion After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07195643 completednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Predictive Factors of Drain Insertion After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Cohort Study

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of BaghdadRan2024 to 2025Enrolled559ConditionsCholecystitisArmsDrain
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Mohammed A BawahabGeneral Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, King Khalid University, Abha 61421, Saudi Arabia;
Walid M Abd El MaksoudGeneral Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, King Khalid University, Abha 61421, Saudi Arabia;
Saeed A AlsareiiGeneral Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Najran University, Najran, P.O. 1988, Saudi Arabia;
Fahad S Al AmriGeneral Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, King Khalid University, Abha 61421, Saudi Arabia;
Hala F AliGeneral Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, King Khalid University, Abha 61421, Saudi Arabia;
Abdul Rahman NimeriGeneral Surgery Department, Sheikh Khalifa Medical City, Abu Dhabi, P.O. 51900, United Arab Emirates;
Abdul Rahman M Al AmriGeneral Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Najran University, Najran, P.O. 1988, Saudi Arabia;
Adel A AssiriGeneral Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Najran University, Najran, P.O. 1988, Saudi Arabia;
Mohammed I Abdul AzizGeneral Surgery, Abha Private Hospital, Abha 61431, Saudi Arabia.
King Khalid University · SANajran University · SAAsir Central Hospital · SAShaikh Khalifa Medical City · AE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many surgeons practice prophylactic drainage after cholecystectomy without reliable evidence. This study was conducted to answer the question whether to drain or not to drain after cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis. A retrospective review of all patients who had cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis in Aseer Central Hospital, Abha, Saudi Arabia, was conducted from April 2010 to April 2012. Data were extracted from hospital case files. Preoperative data included clinical presentation, routine investigations and liver function tests. Operative data included excessive adhesions, bleeding, bile leak, and drain insertion. Complicated cases such as pericholecystic collections, mucocele and empyema were also reported. Patients who needed therapeutic drainage were excluded. Postoperative data included hospital stay, volume of drained fluid, time of drain removal, and drain site problems. The study included 103 patients allocated into two groups; group A (n  =  38) for patients with operative drain insertion and group B (n  =  65) for patients without drain insertion. The number of patients with preoperative diagnosis of acute non-complicated cholecystitis was significantly greater in group B (80%) than group A (36.8%) (P < 0.001). Operative time was significantly longer in group A. All patients who were converted from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy were in group A. Multivariate analysis revealed that hospital stay was significantly (P < 0.001) longer in patients with preoperative complications. There was no added benefit for prophylactic drain insertion after cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis in non-complicated or in complicated cases.

Indexed as

acute cholecystitischolecystectomyroutine drainagesubhepatic collection

Identifiers

PMID25013408
PMCPMC4085562
OpenAlexW2104418339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.