SynthesisMolecular biology reports2014
Association between the MMP-9-1562 C>T polymorphism and the risk of stroke: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Molecular biology reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Matrix Metalloproteinases in Cardioembolic Stroke: From Background to Complications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Does the functional polymorphism-1562C/T of MMP-9 gene influence brain disorders?Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9 so far is identified as extremely large and complicated MMP family member. Recently, dozens of studies have explored the association between a promoter polymorphism (-1562 C>T) in MMP-9 and stroke susceptibility. However, the conclusions of these studies still remain equivocal. Therefore, our current meta-analysis was conducted to investigate whether or not the MMP-9 promoter polymorphism is related to the risk of stroke. Electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database) were searched to obtain all the available studies investigating this polymorphism and stroke from inception to October 2013. Overall and subgroup analyses were rigorously conducted after data extraction. Pooled odds ratio (OR) corresponding to 95 % confidence interval (CI) were estimated. The statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.2. Totally, seven studies involving 1,624 cases and 1,525 controls were identified. The overall results suggested that there was no association of the C-1562T variant on stroke risk under the T allele versus C allele [OR T vs. C 0.98, 95 % CI (0.84, 1.15), P = 0.84], the dominant model [OR TT+TC vs. CC 0.95, 95 % CI (0.81, 1.13), P = 0.59], the recessive model [OR TT vs. TC+CC 1.55, 95 % CI (0.86, 2.81), P = 0.15], the homozygote comparison [OR TT vs. CC 1.48, 95 % CI (0.82, 2.68), P = 0.20] and the heterozygote comparison [OR TC vs. CC 0.93, 95 % CI (0.78, 1.10), P = 0.38]. In the subgroup analyses by ethnicity, age, stroke type and source of controls, no significant relations were observed in any genetic models. Our results indicated that MMP-9-1562 C>T polymorphism was not a risk factor for stroke. Further studies should focus on gene-gene and gene-environment interactions, and provide a more convincing explanation for this association.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25012915What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.