Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25012821›Full record

Observational studyEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2014

Species distribution and in vitro antifungal susceptibility profiles of yeast isolates from invasive infections during a Portuguese multicenter survey.

I Faria-Ramos, J Neves-Maia, E Ricardo, J Santos-Antunes, A T Silva, S Costa-de-Oliveira, E Cantón, A G Rodrigues, C Pina-Vaz

Erratum issuedAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Susceptibility patterns ofInfection prevention in practice · 2024
    Article
  6. Insights intoJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  7. Assessing Diagnosis ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  8. Enhancing ICUFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  11. Regulatory role of Mss11 inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Current medical mycology · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Fluconazole-resistantFrontiers in fungal biology · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Microorganisms · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

I Faria-RamosMicrobiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
J Neves-Maia
E Ricardo
J Santos-Antunes
A T Silva
S Costa-de-Oliveira
E Cantón
A G Rodrigues
C Pina-Vaz
Universidade do Porto · PTHospital de São João · PTInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This is the first Portuguese multicenter observational and descriptive study that provides insights on the species distribution and susceptibility profiles of yeast isolates from fungemia episodes. Ten district hospitals across Portugal contributed by collecting yeast isolates from blood cultures and answering questionnaires concerning patients' data during a 12-month period. Molecular identification of cryptic species of Candida parapsilosis and C. glabrata complex was performed. The susceptibility profile of each isolate, considering eight of the most often used antifungals, was determined. Both Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) protocols were applied. The incidence of 240 episodes of fungemia was 0.88/1,000 admissions. Fifteen different species were found, with C. albicans (40 %) being the most prevalent, followed by C. parapsilosis (23 %) and C. glabrata (13 %). Most isolates were recovered from patients admitted to surgical wards or intensive care units, with 57 % being males and 32 % aged between 41 and 60 years. For both the CLSI and EUCAST protocols, the overall susceptibility rates ranged from 74 to 97 % for echinocandins and from 84 to 98 % for azoles. Important resistance rate discrepancies between protocols were observed in C. albicans and C. glabrata for echinocandins and in C. parapsilosis and C. tropicalis for azoles. Death associated with fungemia occurred in 25 % of the cases, with more than half of C. glabrata infections being fatal. The great number of Candida non-albicans is noteworthy despite a relatively low antifungal resistance rate. Studies like this are essential in order to improve empirical treatment guidelines.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAntifungal AgentsCandidaCandidemiaChildChild, PreschoolDrug Resistance, FungalFemaleHumansIncidenceInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAntifungal Agents

Identifiers

PMID25012821
OpenAlexW4241385389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.