Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25012797›Full record

ArticleHealth policy and planning2014

Who gives birth in private facilities in Asia? A look at six countries.

Amanda M Pomeroy, Marge Koblinsky, Soumya Alva

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health policy and planning, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amanda M PomeroyJohn Snow Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA, United States Agency for International Development, 1300 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington, DC 20004, USA and John Snow Inc., 1616 N. Fort Myer Dr, 16th Floor, Arlington, VA 22209 amanda_pomeroy@jsi.com.
Marge KoblinskyJohn Snow Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA, United States Agency for International Development, 1300 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington, DC 20004, USA and John Snow Inc., 1616 N. Fort Myer Dr, 16th Floor, Arlington, VA 22209.
Soumya AlvaJohn Snow Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA, United States Agency for International Development, 1300 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington, DC 20004, USA and John Snow Inc., 1616 N. Fort Myer Dr, 16th Floor, Arlington, VA 22209.
United States Agency for International Development · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past two decades, multilateral organizations have encouraged increased engagement with private healthcare providers in developing countries. As these efforts progress, there are concerns regarding how private delivery care may effect maternal health outcomes. Currently available data do not allow for an in-depth study of the direct effect of increasing private sector use on maternal health across countries. As a first step, however, we use demographic and health surveys (DHS) data to (1) examine trends in growth of delivery care provided by private facilities and (2) describe who is using the private sector within the healthcare system. As Asia has shown strong increases in institutional coverage of delivery care in the last decade, we will examine trends in six Asian countries. We hypothesize that if the private sector competes for clients based on perceived quality, their clientele will be wealthier, more educated and live in an area where there are enough health facilities to allow for competition. We test this hypothesis by examining factors of socio-demographic, economic and physical access and actual/perceived need related to a mother's choice to deliver in a health facility and then, among women delivering in a facility, their use of a private provider. Results show a significant trend towards greater use of private sector delivery care over the last decade. Wealth and education are related to private sector delivery care in about half of our countries, but are not as universally related to use as we would expect. A previous private facility birth predicted repeat private facility use across nearly all countries. In two countries (Cambodia and India), primiparity also predicted private facility use. More in-depth work is needed to truly understand the behaviour of the private sector in these countries; these results warn against making generalizations about private sector delivery care.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesAdultAsiaBirthing CentersDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHealth FacilitiesHealth PersonnelHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaternal Health ServicesPrivate SectorAsiadelivery careMaternal healthprivate sector

Identifiers

PMID25012797
PMCPMC4095919
OpenAlexW2137606402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.