ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology
Safety and effectiveness of sacroplasty: a large single-center experience.
Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.
- Balloon-assisted sacroplasty as a successful procedure for osteoporotic sacral insufficiency fractures after failure of the conservative treatment.Scientific reports · 2020Trial
- Finite element validation and short-term clinical outcomes of robot-assisted percutaneous microwave ablation plus cement augmentation and sacroiliac screw fixation for upper sacral (S1-S2) metastases.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
- Sacral insufficiency fracture: a single-center experience of 185 patients with a minimum 5-year follow-up.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024Article
- Sacroplasty for Sacral Insufficiency Fractures: Narrative Literature Review on Patient Selection, Technical Approaches, and Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Comparison of patterns and rates of cement leakage in percutaneous sacroplasty for sacral insufficiency fractures versus neoplasia.Skeletal radiology · 2024Article
- Combination of long- and short-axis alar sacroplasty techniques under fluoroscopic guidance for osteoporotic sacral insufficiency fracture.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2021Article
- Percutaneous Sacroplasty : Effectiveness and Long-Term Outcome Predictors.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2020Article
- [Minimally invasive stabilization of sacral fractures].Der Unfallchirurg · 2020Review
- Sacral Insufficiency Fractures: a Review of Risk Factors, Clinical Presentation, and Management.Current pain and headache reports · 2020Review
- Fluoroscopy-Guided Percutaneous Sacroplasty for Painful Metastases at the Sacral Ala.Journal of pain research · 2020Article
- Safety and efficacy of percutaneous sacroplasty for treatment of sacral insufficiency fractures: a systematic review.Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) · 2019Review
- Comparison of low-dose CT with CT/CT fluoroscopy guidance in percutaneous sacral and supra-acetabular cementoplasty.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2019Article
- ASSERT (Acute Sacral inSufficiEncy fractuRe augmenTation) randomised controlled, feasibility in older people trial: a study protocol.BMJ open · 2019Article
- Percutaneous Sacroplasty for Painful Sacral Metastases Involving Multiple Sacral Vertebral Bodies: Initial Experience with an Interpedicular Approach.Korean journal of radiology · 2019Article
- Effects of Percutaneous Sacroplasty on Pain and Mobility in Sacral Insufficiency Fracture.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2017Article
- Subchondral Calcium Phosphate is Ineffective for Bone Marrow Edema Lesions in Adults With Advanced Osteoarthritis.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2015Article
- Sacroplasty for cancer-associated insufficiency fractures.Neurosurgery · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeSacral insufficiency fractures are a common cause of severe low back pain and immobilization in patients with osteoporosis or cancer. Current practice guideline recommendations range from analgesia and physical therapy to resection with surgical fixation. We sought to assess the safety and effectiveness of sacroplasty, an emerging minimally invasive treatment. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe performed a retrospective review of institutional databases for percutaneous sacroplasty performed between January 2004 and September 2013. Demographic and procedural data and pre- and posttreatment Visual Analog Scale, Functional Mobility Scale, and Analgesic Scale scores were reviewed. Overall response was rated by using a 4-point scale (1, complete resolution of pain; 2, improvement of pain; 3, no change; 4, worsened pain) assessed at short-term follow-up.
resultsFifty-three patients were included; most (83%) were female. Fracture etiology was cancer-related (55%), osteoporotic insufficiency (30%), and minor trauma (15%). No major complication or procedure-related morbidity occurred. There were statistically significant decreases in the Visual Analog Scale (P < .001), Functional Mobility Scale (P < .001), and Analgesic Scale scores (P < .01) in 27 patients with recorded data: pretreatment Visual Analog Scale (median [interquartile range], 9.0 [8.0-10.0]); Functional Mobility Scale, 3.0 (2.0-3.0); and Analgesic Scale scores, 3.0 (3.0-4.0) were reduced to 3.0 (0.0-5.8), 1.0 (0.25-2.8), and 3.0 (2.0-3.8) posttreatment. When we used the overall 4-point score at a mean of 27 days, 93% (n = 45) reported complete resolution or improvement in overall pain.
conclusionsIn this single-center cohort, sacroplasty was a safe and effective procedure. There were significant short-term gains in pain relief, increased mobility, and decreased dependence on pain medication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.