Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25012293›Full record

ReviewTrends in neurosciences2014

The multifunctional Staufen proteins: conserved roles from neurogenesis to synaptic plasticity.

Jacki E Heraud-Farlow, Michael A Kiebler

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in neurosciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Bioinformatic Approach to Identify PotentialInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. The long noncoding RNAScience advances · 2022
    Article
  17. dsRNA-induced condensation of antiviral proteins modulates PKR activity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Circular RNAs: Emblematic Players of Neurogenesis and Neurodegeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jacki E Heraud-FarlowDepartment of Chromosome Biology, Max F. Perutz Laboratories, University of Vienna, 1030 Vienna, Austria.
Michael A KieblerDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, 80336 Munich, Germany. Electronic address: michael.kiebler@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEMax Perutz Labs · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Staufen (Stau) proteins belong to a family of RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) that are important for RNA localisation in many organisms. In this review we discuss recent findings on the conserved role played by Stau during both the early differentiation of neurons and in the synaptic plasticity of mature neurons. Recent molecular data suggest mechanisms for how Stau2 regulates mRNA localisation, mRNA stability, translation, and ribonucleoprotein (RNP) assembly. We offer a perspective on how this multifunctional RBP has been adopted to regulate mRNA localisation under several different cellular and developmental conditions.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainHumansMemoryNeurogenesisNeuronal PlasticityRNA-Binding ProteinsRNA TransportRNA-Binding Proteinslearning and memorymRNA stabilityneurogenesisRNA localisationRNPStaufensynaptic plasticity

Identifiers

PMID25012293
PMCPMC4156307
OpenAlexW2020700519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.