Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25011730›Full record

Trial reportTrials2014

Obsessive Compulsive Treatment Efficacy Trial (OCTET) comparing the clinical and cost effectiveness of self-managed therapies: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Judith Gellatly, Peter Bower, Dean McMillan, Christopher Roberts, Sarah Byford, Penny Bee, Simon Gilbody, Catherine Arundel, Gillian Hardy, Michael Barkham and 10 more

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Judith GellatlySchool of Nursing, Midwifery & Social Work, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. judith.l.gellatly@manchester.ac.uk.
Peter Bower
Dean McMillan
Christopher Roberts
Sarah Byford
Penny Bee
Simon Gilbody
Catherine Arundel
Gillian Hardy
Michael Barkham
Shirley Reynolds
Lina Gega
Patricia Mottram
Nicola Lidbetter
Rebecca Pedley
Emily Peckham
Janice Connell
Jo Molle
Neil O'Leary
Karina Lovell

Funding

Department of Health 09/81/01Medical Research Council G0401181
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUK National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence guidelines for obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) specify recommendations for the treatment and management of OCD using a stepped care approach. Steps three to six of this model recommend treatment options for people with OCD that range from low-intensity guided self-help (GSH) to more intensive psychological and pharmacological interventions. Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), including exposure and response prevention, is the recommended psychological treatment. However, whilst there is some preliminary evidence that self-managed therapy packages for OCD can be effective, a more robust evidence base of their clinical and cost effectiveness and acceptability is required. METHODS/

designOur proposed study will test two different self-help treatments for OCD: 1) computerised CBT (cCBT) using OCFighter, an internet-delivered OCD treatment package; and 2) GSH using a book. Both treatments will be accompanied by email or telephone support from a mental health professional. We will evaluate the effectiveness, cost and patient and health professional acceptability of the treatments. DISCUSSION: This study will provide more robust evidence of efficacy, cost effectiveness and acceptability of self-help treatments for OCD. If cCBT and/or GSH prove effective, it will provide additional, more accessible treatment options for people with OCD.

trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials: ISRCTN73535163. Date of registration: 5 April 2011.

Indexed as

BooksHealth Care CostsResearch DesignAttitude of Health PersonnelClinical ProtocolsCognitive Behavioral TherapyCost-Benefit AnalysisHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInternetObsessive-Compulsive DisorderPatient Acceptance of Health CarePredictive Value of TestsPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesSelf CareTherapy, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID25011730
PMCPMC4226946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.