ReviewFungal genetics and biology : FG & B2014
Fungal model systems and the elucidation of pathogenicity determinants.
Review in Fungal genetics and biology : FG & B, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
77 citing papers in PubMed, 171 citations in OpenAlex.
- Stability of fungicide-variety management strategies for Septoria tritici blotch in wheat: insights from AMMI and GGE biplot analyses across multiple environments.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Within-Population Genetic Structuring of the Cosmopolitan FungusEcology and evolution · 2026Article
- Solanaceous vegetables andHorticulture research · 2026Article
- The role of latitude and the Carpathian Mountain barrier in the spatial spread and population bottlenecks of Schizophyllum commune.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- Enhancing genomic prediction ability of blast resistance using genome-wide association study-derived marker weights in two rice (Oryza sativa L.) populations.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026Article
- Proteomic characterization ofVirulence · 2025Article
- Genomic factors limiting the diversity of Saccharomycotina plant pathogens.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025Article
- The TOX2 Gene Is Responsible for Conidiation and Full Virulence inCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2025Article
- Advancing forest pathology: the need for community-driven molecular experimental model systems.The New phytologist · 2025Review
- The local-scale populations reveal cryptic processes occurring in the general population of Schizophyllum commune fungus.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Nanopore Data-Driven T2T Genome Assemblies ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Oral administration of Lactobacillus delbrueckii UFV-H2b20 protects mice against Aspergillus fumigatus lung infection.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2024Article
- Comparative Genomic Analyses ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Differential Carbon Catabolite Repression and Hemicellulolytic Ability among Pathotypes ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Pyricularia oryzae: Lab star and field scourge.Molecular plant pathology · 2024Review
- Gene expression signatures of mutualism and pathogenesis in flax roots.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Navigating the fungal battlefield: cysteine-rich antifungal proteins and peptides from Eurotiales.Frontiers in fungal biology · 2024Review
- Helium Cold Atmospheric Plasma Causes Morphological and Biochemical Alterations inMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Differences in the Production of Extracellular Polymeric Substances (EPS) and Other Metabolites ofMetabolites · 2023Article
- Regulation of pseurotin A biosynthesis by GliZ and zinc in Aspergillus fumigatus.Scientific reports · 2023Article
17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors at 10 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Fungi have the capacity to cause devastating diseases of both plants and animals, causing significant harvest losses that threaten food security and human mycoses with high mortality rates. As a consequence, there is a critical need to promote development of new antifungal drugs, which requires a comprehensive molecular knowledge of fungal pathogenesis. In this review, we critically evaluate current knowledge of seven fungal organisms used as major research models for fungal pathogenesis. These include pathogens of both animals and plants; Ashbya gossypii, Aspergillus fumigatus, Candida albicans, Fusarium oxysporum, Magnaporthe oryzae, Ustilago maydis and Zymoseptoria tritici. We present key insights into the virulence mechanisms deployed by each species and a comparative overview of key insights obtained from genomic analysis. We then consider current trends and future challenges associated with the study of fungal pathogenicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.