Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25010773›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

The relationship between therapeutic alliance and service user satisfaction in mental health inpatient wards and crisis house alternatives: a cross-sectional study.

Angela Sweeney, Sarah Fahmy, Fiona Nolan, Nicola Morant, Zoe Fox, Brynmor Lloyd-Evans, David Osborn, Emma Burgess, Helen Gilburt, Rosemarie McCabe and 2 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Acute psychiatric care: approaches to increasing the range of services and improving access and quality of care.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Relationship between Mentalizing and Working Conditions in Health Care.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Angela SweeneyDivision of Psychiatry, UCL, London, United Kingdom.
Sarah FahmyDivision of Psychiatry, UCL, London, United Kingdom.
Fiona NolanCentre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness (CORE), UCL, London, United Kingdom; Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Nicola MorantUniversity of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK & UCL, London, United Kingdom.
Zoe FoxJoint Research Office and Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, United Kingdom.
Brynmor Lloyd-EvansDivision of Psychiatry, UCL, London, United Kingdom.
David OsbornDivision of Psychiatry, UCL, London, United Kingdom.
Emma BurgessDivision of Psychiatry, UCL, London, United Kingdom.
Helen GilburtInstitute of Psychiatry, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom.
Rosemarie McCabeUniversity of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Mike SladeInstitute of Psychiatry, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom.
Sonia JohnsonMent Division of Psychiatry, UCL, London, United Kingdom; Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

Department of Health 09/1001/51Department of Health PB-PG-0808-17014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPoor service user experiences are often reported on mental health inpatient wards. Crisis houses are an alternative, but evidence is limited. This paper investigates therapeutic alliances in acute wards and crisis houses, exploring how far stronger therapeutic alliance may underlie greater client satisfaction in crisis houses. METHODS AND

findingsMixed methods were used. In the quantitative component, 108 crisis house and 247 acute ward service users responded to measures of satisfaction, therapeutic relationships, informal peer support, recovery and negative events experienced during the admission. Linear regressions were conducted to estimate the association between service setting and measures, and to model the factors associated with satisfaction. Qualitative interviews exploring therapeutic alliances were conducted with service users and staff in each setting and analysed thematically.

resultsWe found that therapeutic alliances, service user satisfaction and informal peer support were greater in crisis houses than on acute wards, whilst self-rated recovery and numbers of negative events were lower. Adjusted multivariable analyses suggest that therapeutic relationships, informal peer support and negative experiences related to staff may be important factors in accounting for greater satisfaction in crisis houses. Qualitative results suggest factors that influence therapeutic alliances include service user perceptions of basic human qualities such as kindness and empathy in staff and, at service level, the extent of loss of liberty and autonomy. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: We found that service users experience better therapeutic relationships and higher satisfaction in crisis houses compared to acute wards, although we cannot exclude the possibility that differences in service user characteristics contribute to this. This finding provides some support for the expansion of crisis house provision. Further research is needed to investigate why acute ward service users experience a lack of compassion and humanity from ward staff and how this could be changed.

Indexed as

AdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCross-Sectional StudiesEnvironmentFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansInpatientsMaleMental Health ServicesModels, TheoreticalMoralePatient SatisfactionSocial Support

Identifiers

PMID25010773
PMCPMC4091866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.