Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25010690›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

System vaccinology for the evaluation of influenza vaccine safety by multiplex gene detection of novel biomarkers in a preclinical study and batch release test.

Takuo Mizukami, Haruka Momose, Madoka Kuramitsu, Kazuya Takizawa, Kumiko Araki, Keiko Furuhata, Ken J Ishii, Isao Hamaguchi, Kazunari Yamaguchi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Innovative micro physiological systems for vaccine development.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Vaccine hesitancy : Report of a student study group.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2020
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Takuo MizukamiLaboratory of Blood and Vaccine safety, Department of Safety Research on Blood and Biologicals, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Haruka MomoseLaboratory of Blood and Vaccine safety, Department of Safety Research on Blood and Biologicals, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Madoka KuramitsuLaboratory of Blood and Vaccine safety, Department of Safety Research on Blood and Biologicals, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazuya TakizawaLaboratory of Blood and Vaccine safety, Department of Safety Research on Blood and Biologicals, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Kumiko ArakiLaboratory of Blood and Vaccine safety, Department of Safety Research on Blood and Biologicals, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Keiko FuruhataLaboratory of Blood and Vaccine safety, Department of Safety Research on Blood and Biologicals, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Ken J IshiiLaboratory of Adjuvant Innovation, National Institute of Biomedical Innovation (NIBIO), Osaka, Japan; Laboratory of Vaccine Science, WPI Immunology Frontier Research Center (WPI-IFREC), Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Isao HamaguchiLaboratory of Blood and Vaccine safety, Department of Safety Research on Blood and Biologicals, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazunari YamaguchiLaboratory of Blood and Vaccine safety, Department of Safety Research on Blood and Biologicals, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
National Institute of Infectious Diseases · JPOsaka University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccines are beneficial and universal tools to prevent infectious disease. Thus, safety of vaccines is strictly evaluated in the preclinical phase of trials and every vaccine batch must be tested by the National Control Laboratories according to the guidelines published by each country. Despite many vaccine production platforms and methods, animal testing for safety evaluation is unchanged thus far. We recently developed a systems biological approach to vaccine safety evaluation where identification of specific biomarkers in a rat pre-clinical study evaluated the safety of vaccines for pandemic H5N1 influenza including Irf7, Lgals9, Lgalsbp3, Cxcl11, Timp1, Tap2, Psmb9, Psme1, Tapbp, C2, Csf1, Mx2, Zbp1, Ifrd1, Trafd1, Cxcl9, β2m, Npc1, Ngfr and Ifi47. The current study evaluated whether these 20 biomarkers could evaluate the safety, batch-to-batch and manufacturer-to-manufacturer consistency of seasonal trivalent influenza vaccine using a multiplex gene detection system. When we evaluated the influenza HA vaccine (HAv) from four different manufactures, the biomarker analysis correlated to findings from conventional animal use tests, such as abnormal toxicity test. In addition, sensitivity of toxicity detection and differences in HAvs were higher and more accurate than with conventional methods. Despite a slight decrease in body weight caused by HAv from manufacturer B that was not statistically significant, our results suggest that HAv from manufacturer B is significantly different than the other HAvs tested with regard to Lgals3bp, Tapbp, Lgals9, Irf7 and C2 gene expression in rat lungs. Using the biomarkers confirmed in this study, we predicted batch-to-batch consistency and safety of influenza vaccines within 2 days compared with the conventional safety test, which takes longer. These biomarkers will facilitate the future development of new influenza vaccines and provide an opportunity to develop in vitro methods of evaluating batch-to-batch consistency and vaccine safety as an alternative to animal testing.

Indexed as

SafetyAnimalsBiomarkersInfluenza A Virus, H1N1 SubtypeInfluenza A Virus, H3N2 SubtypeInfluenza A Virus, H5N1 SubtypeInfluenza VaccinesMaleRatsSeasonsToxicity TestsTranscriptomeBiomarkersInfluenza Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID25010690
PMCPMC4092028
OpenAlexW1999188553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.