Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25010556›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2014

The dynamics of DNA methylation covariation patterns in carcinogenesis.

Andrew E Teschendorff, Xiaoping Liu, Helena Caren, Steve M Pollard, Stephan Beck, Martin Widschwendter, Luonan Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Embracing non-linearity in human ageing.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. On epigenetic stochasticity, entropy and cancer risk.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Statistical mechanics meets single-cell biology.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Methylomic Analysis of Ovarian Cancers Identifies Tumor-Specific Alterations Readily Detectable in Early Precursor Lesions.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2018
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Andrew E TeschendorffCAS-MPG Partner Institute for Computational Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai Institute for Biological Sciences, Shanghai, China; Statistical Genomics Group, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Xiaoping LiuKey Laboratory of Systems Biology, SIBS-Nordisk Translational Research Centre for PreDiabetes, Shanghai Institute for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Helena CarenSahlgrenska Cancer Center, Department of Pathology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Steve M PollardDepartment of Cancer Biology, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Stephan BeckMedical Genomics Group, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Martin WidschwendterDepartment of Women's Cancer, UCL EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Luonan ChenKey Laboratory of Systems Biology, SIBS-Nordisk Translational Research Centre for PreDiabetes, Shanghai Institute for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.
University College London · GBChinese Academy of Sciences · CNGenomics England · GBSahlgrenska University Hospital · SEShanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently it has been observed that cancer tissue is characterised by an increased variability in DNA methylation patterns. However, how the correlative patterns in genome-wide DNA methylation change during the carcinogenic progress has not yet been explored. Here we study genome-wide inter-CpG correlations in DNA methylation, in addition to single site variability, during cervical carcinogenesis. We demonstrate how the study of changes in DNA methylation covariation patterns across normal, intra-epithelial neoplasia and invasive cancer allows the identification of CpG sites that indicate the risk of neoplastic transformation in stages prior to neoplasia. Importantly, we show that the covariation in DNA methylation at these risk CpG loci is maximal immediately prior to the onset of cancer, supporting the view that high epigenetic diversity in normal cells increases the risk of cancer. Consistent with this, we observe that invasive cancers exhibit increased covariation in DNA methylation at the risk CpG sites relative to normal tissue, but lower levels relative to pre-cancerous lesions. We further show that the identified risk CpG sites undergo preferential DNA methylation changes in relation to human papilloma virus infection and age. Results are validated in independent data including prospectively collected samples prior to neoplastic transformation. Our data are consistent with a phase transition model of carcinogenesis, in which epigenetic diversity is maximal prior to the onset of cancer. The model and algorithm proposed here may allow, in future, network biomarkers predicting the risk of neoplastic transformation to be identified.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBiomarkers, TumorCarcinogenesisComputational BiologyDisease ProgressionDNA MethylationFemaleHumansPapillomavirus InfectionsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID25010556
PMCPMC4091688
OpenAlexW2105208902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.