Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25010534›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2014

Meta-analysis assessment of GP210 and SP100 for the diagnosis of primary biliary cirrhosis.

Shi-Ling Hu, Feng-Rong Zhao, Qin Hu, Wei-Xian Chen

Expression of concernOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It carries an expression of concern. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shi-Ling HuThe Department of Laboratory Medicine, the Second Hospital Affiliated to Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Feng-Rong ZhaoThe Department of Gynecology and obstetrics, Youyang People's Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Qin HuThe Department of Laboratory Medicine, the Second Hospital Affiliated to Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Wei-Xian ChenThe Department of Laboratory Medicine, the Second Hospital Affiliated to Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Dalian Medical University · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo conduct a systematic review of included studies assessing the association of GP210 and SP100 with the risk of primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) using meta-analysis.

methodsFive databases, the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, VIP, CNKI, WANFANG were used to detect the role of GP210 and SP100 in diagnosis of PBC. Approximately 13,000 participants from several countries were included in this analysis. Meta-DiSc statistical software was used for analysis.

results25 studies on GP210 and 21 studies on SP100 were included in the meta-analysis. The DOR, sensitivity, specificity of GP210 in diagnosis of PBC were 24.854 (11.957-51.660), 0.272 (0.257-0.288), 0.985 (0.982-0.988), respectively, and they were 9.133 (4.739-17.600), 0.231 (0.213-0.249), 0.977 (0.973-0.981) for SP100.

conclusionOur meta-analysis indicated both GP210 and SP100 had high specificity but low sensitivity in diagnosis of PBC.

Indexed as

Antibodies, AntinuclearAntigens, NuclearAutoantigensHumansLiver Cirrhosis, BiliaryNuclear Pore Complex ProteinsAntibodies, AntinuclearAntigens, NuclearAutoantigensNuclear Pore Complex ProteinsSP100 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID25010534
PMCPMC4092088
OpenAlexW2011169037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.