ArticleBiochemistry2014
Structure and catalysis in the Escherichia coli hotdog-fold thioesterase paralogs YdiI and YbdB.
Article in Biochemistry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Thioesterase enzyme families: Functions, structures, and mechanisms.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2022Article
- Biotransformation of Benzoate to 2,4,6-Trihydroxybenzophenone by EngineeredMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Characterisation of four hotdog-fold thioesterases for their implementation in a novel organic acid production system.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2020Article
- CSmetaPred: a consensus method for prediction of catalytic residues.BMC bioinformatics · 2017Article
- Structural insights into GDP-mediated regulation of a bacterial acyl-CoA thioesterase.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2017Article
- Catalytic Mechanism of the Hotdog-Fold Thioesterase PA1618 Revealed by X-ray Structure Determination of a Substrate-Bound Oxygen Ester Analogue Complex.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2017Article
- Structural analysis of the dual-function thioesterase SAV606 unravels the mechanism of Michael addition of glycine to an α,β-unsaturated thioester.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2017Article
- Enzyme promiscuity: engine of evolutionary innovation.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2014Review
- Divergence of substrate specificity and function in the Escherichia coli hotdog-fold thioesterase paralogs YdiI and YbdB.Biochemistry · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Herein, the structural determinants for substrate recognition and catalysis in two hotdog-fold thioesterase paralogs, YbdB and YdiI from Escherichia coli, are identified and analyzed to provide insight into the evolution of biological function in the hotdog-fold enzyme superfamily. The X-ray crystal structures of YbdB and YdiI, in complex with inert substrate analogs, determined in this study revealed the locations of the respective thioester substrate binding sites and the identity of the residues positioned for substrate binding and catalysis. The importance of each of these residues was assessed through amino acid replacements followed by steady-state kinetic analyses of the corresponding site-directed mutants. Transient kinetic and solvent (18)O-labeling studies were then carried out to provide insight into the role of Glu63 posited to function as the nucleophile or general base in catalysis. Finally, the structure-function-mechanism profiles of the two paralogs, along with that of a more distant homolog, were compared to identify conserved elements of substrate recognition and catalysis, which define the core traits of the hotdog-fold thioesterase family, as well as structural features that are unique to each thioesterase. Founded on the insight gained from this analysis, we conclude that the promiscuity revealed by in vitro substrate activity determinations, and posited to facilitate the evolution of new biological function, is the product of intrinsic plasticity in substrate binding as well as in the catalytic mechanism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.