Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25010228›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2014

Biophysical fitness landscapes for transcription factor binding sites.

Allan Haldane, Michael Manhart, Alexandre V Morozov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Anticipating response function in gene regulatory networks.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Comprehensive, high-resolution binding energy landscapes reveal context dependencies of transcription factor binding.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Allan HaldaneDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, United States of America.
Michael ManhartDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, United States of America.
Alexandre V MorozovDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, United States of America; BioMaPS Institute for Quantitative Biology, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, United States of America.

Funding

Biophysical Models for Prediction and Design of Eukaryotic Chromatin Structure anR01HG004708 · NHGRI · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI MOROZOV, ALEXANDRE V · 2009 to 2012
$1.1M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG004708
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phenotypic states and evolutionary trajectories available to cell populations are ultimately dictated by complex interactions among DNA, RNA, proteins, and other molecular species. Here we study how evolution of gene regulation in a single-cell eukaryote S. cerevisiae is affected by interactions between transcription factors (TFs) and their cognate DNA sites. Our study is informed by a comprehensive collection of genomic binding sites and high-throughput in vitro measurements of TF-DNA binding interactions. Using an evolutionary model for monomorphic populations evolving on a fitness landscape, we infer fitness as a function of TF-DNA binding to show that the shape of the inferred fitness functions is in broad agreement with a simple functional form inspired by a thermodynamic model of two-state TF-DNA binding. However, the effective parameters of the model are not always consistent with physical values, indicating selection pressures beyond the biophysical constraints imposed by TF-DNA interactions. We find little statistical support for the fitness landscape in which each position in the binding site evolves independently, indicating that epistasis is common in the evolution of gene regulation. Finally, by correlating TF-DNA binding energies with biological properties of the sites or the genes they regulate, we are able to rule out several scenarios of site-specific selection, under which binding sites of the same TF would experience different selection pressures depending on their position in the genome. These findings support the existence of universal fitness landscapes which shape evolution of all sites for a given TF, and whose properties are determined in part by the physics of protein-DNA interactions.

Indexed as

DNAModels, BiologicalTranscription FactorsBinding SitesComputational BiologyProtein BindingSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsDNASaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID25010228
PMCPMC4091707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.