Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25009752›Full record

ArticleCancer biology & medicine2014

Incidence and mortality of female breast cancer in the Asia-Pacific region.

Danny R Youlden, Susanna M Cramb, Cheng Har Yip, Peter D Baade

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer biology & medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 206 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
206citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

206 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Breast cancer screening in developing countries.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2017
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Elevated phthalate exposure and metabolic susceptibility increased breast cancer risk: A 20-y follow-up study in Taiwan.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

146 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Danny R Youlden1 Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane 4006, Australia ; 2 School of Mathematical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane 4000, Australia ; 3 Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia ; 4 Griffith Health Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast 4222, Australia ; 5 School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane 4000, Australia.
Susanna M Cramb1 Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane 4006, Australia ; 2 School of Mathematical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane 4000, Australia ; 3 Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia ; 4 Griffith Health Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast 4222, Australia ; 5 School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane 4000, Australia.
Cheng Har Yip1 Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane 4006, Australia ; 2 School of Mathematical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane 4000, Australia ; 3 Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia ; 4 Griffith Health Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast 4222, Australia ; 5 School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane 4000, Australia.
Peter D Baade1 Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane 4006, Australia ; 2 School of Mathematical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane 4000, Australia ; 3 Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia ; 4 Griffith Health Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast 4222, Australia ; 5 School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane 4000, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo provide an overview of the incidence and mortality of female breast cancer for countries in the Asia-Pacific region.

methodsStatistical information about breast cancer was obtained from publicly available cancer registry and mortality databases (such as GLOBOCAN), and supplemented with data requested from individual cancer registries. Rates were directly age-standardised to the Segi World Standard population and trends were analysed using joinpoint models.

resultsBreast cancer was the most common type of cancer among females in the region, accounting for 18% of all cases in 2012, and was the fourth most common cause of cancer-related deaths (9%). Although incidence rates remain much higher in New Zealand and Australia, rapid rises in recent years were observed in several Asian countries. Large increases in breast cancer mortality rates also occurred in many areas, particularly Malaysia and Thailand, in contrast to stabilising trends in Hong Kong and Singapore, while decreases have been recorded in Australia and New Zealand. Mortality trends tended to be more favourable for women aged under 50 compared to those who were 50 years or older.

conclusionIt is anticipated that incidence rates of breast cancer in developing countries throughout the Asia-Pacific region will continue to increase. Early detection and access to optimal treatment are the keys to reducing breast cancer-related mortality, but cultural and economic obstacles persist. Consequently, the challenge is to customise breast cancer control initiatives to the particular needs of each country to ensure the best possible outcomes.

Indexed as

Asia-Pacific regionepidemiologyfemale breast cancerincidencemortality

Identifiers

PMID25009752
PMCPMC4069805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.