Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25009695›Full record

ArticleCerebrum : the Dana forum on brain science2014

Equal ≠ the same: sex differences in the human brain.

Larry Cahill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebrum : the Dana forum on brain science, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. "Precision Medicine" and the Failed Search for Binary Brain Sex Differences to Address Gender Behavioral Health Disparities.American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Gender differences in cognitive reserve: implication for subjective cognitive decline in women.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Sex differences in psychiatric disorders: what we can learn from sex chromosome aneuploidies.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Sex differences, gender and addiction.Journal of neuroscience research · 2017
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Sex differences in chronic stress effects on cognition in rodents.Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior · 2017
    Review
  20. Sex as a Biological Variable: Who, What, When, Why, and How.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Larry Cahill

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While advances in brain imaging confirm that men and women think in their own way and that their brains are different, the biomedical community mainly uses male animals as testing subjects with the assumption that sex differences in the brain hardly matter. This month's Cerebrum highlights some of the thinking and research that invalidates that assumption.

Identifiers

PMID25009695
PMCPMC4087190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.