ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2014
A dual-species co-cultivation system to study the interactions between Roseobacters and dinoflagellates.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
63 citing papers in PubMed, 129 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Article
- Defining the ecological strategies of phytoplankton associated bacteria.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Environmental diversity ofmSystems · 2025Article
- Iron limitation triggers roseoceramide biosynthesis and membrane remodeling in marine roseobacter.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Metabolic interdependence and rewiring in radiolaria-microalgae photosymbioses.The ISME journal · 2025Article
- Article
- Conspicuous chloroplast with light harvesting-photosystem I/II megacomplex in marine Prorocentrum cordatum.Plant physiology · 2024Article
- Interaction between phytoplankton and heterotrophic bacteria in Arctic fjords during the glacial melting season as revealed by eDNA metabarcoding.FEMS microbiology ecology · 2024Article
- Algal blooms in the ocean: hot spots for chemically mediated microbial interactions.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2024Review
- Impact of airborne algicidal bacteria on marine phytoplankton blooms.The ISME journal · 2024Article
- Taxonomic, Phylogenomic and Bioactivity Profiling of Novel Phycosphere Bacterium from Model CyanobacteriumMarine drugs · 2024Article
- Analysis of the bacterial and fungal populations in South African sorghum beer (umqombothi) using full-length 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2023Article
- Abundant Sulfitobacter marine bacteria protect Emiliania huxleyi algae from pathogenic bacteria.ISME communications · 2023Article
- The enigmatic nucleus of the marine dinoflagellatemSphere · 2023Article
- Nutrient removal and biogas upgrade using co-cultivation of Chlorella vulgaris and three different bacteria under various GR24 concentrations by induction with 5-deoxystrigol.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2023Article
- Vitamin BThe ISME journal · 2023Article
- Article
- Microalgal co-cultivation -recent methods, trends in omic-studies, applications, and future challenges.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Review
- The Small-Molecule Language of Dynamic Microbial Interactions.Annual review of microbiology · 2022Review
3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Some microalgae in nature live in symbiosis with microorganisms that can enhance or inhibit growth, thus influencing the dynamics of phytoplankton blooms. In spite of the great ecological importance of these interactions, very few defined laboratory systems are available to study them in detail. Here we present a co-cultivation system consisting of the toxic phototrophic dinoflagellate Prorocentrum minimum and the photoheterotrophic alphaproteobacterium Dinoroseobacter shibae. In a mineral medium lacking a carbon source, vitamins for the bacterium and the essential vitamin B12 for the dinoflagellate, growth dynamics reproducibly went from a mutualistic phase, where both algae and bacteria grow, to a pathogenic phase, where the algae are killed by the bacteria. The data show a "Jekyll and Hyde" lifestyle that had been proposed but not previously demonstrated. We used RNAseq and microarray analysis to determine which genes of D. shibae are transcribed and differentially expressed in a light dependent way at an early time-point of the co-culture when the bacterium grows very slowly. Enrichment of bacterial mRNA for transcriptome analysis was optimized, but none of the available methods proved capable of removing dinoflagellate ribosomal RNA completely. RNAseq showed that a phasin encoding gene (phaP1 ) which is part of the polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) metabolism operon represented approximately 10% of all transcripts. Five genes for aerobic anoxygenic photosynthesis were down-regulated in the light, indicating that the photosynthesis apparatus was functional. A betaine-choline-carnitine-transporter (BCCT) that may be used for dimethylsulfoniopropionate (DMSP) uptake was the highest up-regulated gene in the light. The data suggest that at this early mutualistic phase of the symbiosis, PHA degradation might be the main carbon and energy source of D. shibae, supplemented in the light by degradation of DMSP and aerobic anoxygenic photosynthesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.