Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25009476›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in systems neuroscience2014

Enlarging the scope: grasping brain complexity.

Emmanuelle Tognoli, J A Scott Kelso

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Lag threads organize the brain's intrinsic activity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Topological portraits of multiscale coordination dynamics.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A roadmap for the study of conscious audition and its neural basis.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  17. Cortical Variability and Challenges for Modeling Approaches.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Emmanuelle TognoliThe Human Brain and Behavior Laboratory, Center for Complex Systems and Brain Sciences, Florida Atlantic University Boca Raton, FL, USA.
J A Scott KelsoThe Human Brain and Behavior Laboratory, Center for Complex Systems and Brain Sciences, Florida Atlantic University Boca Raton, FL, USA ; Intelligent System Research Centre, University of Ulster Derry, Northern Ireland.

Funding

Neuromarkers of Social Coordination: A Dynamical Approach competing renewal forR01MH080838 · NIMH · FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY · PI KELSO, J A SCOTT, TOGNOLI, EMMANUELLE · 2008 to 2018
$3.6M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH080838
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To further advance our understanding of the brain, new concepts and theories are needed. In particular, the ability of the brain to create information flows must be reconciled with its propensity for synchronization and mass action. The theoretical and empirical framework of Coordination Dynamics, a key aspect of which is metastability, are presented as a starting point to study the interplay of integrative and segregative tendencies that are expressed in space and time during the normal course of brain and behavioral function. Some recent shifts in perspective are emphasized, that may ultimately lead to a better understanding of brain complexity.

Indexed as

brain coordination dynamicsfunctional connectivityintegrationmetastabilitysegregation

Identifiers

PMID25009476
PMCPMC4070173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.