Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25009453›Full record

ArticleCurrent nutrition and food science2014

Feasibility of Increased Navy Bean Powder Consumption for Primary and Secondary Colorectal Cancer Prevention.

Erica C Borresen, Kerry A Gundlach, Melissa Wdowik, Sangeeta Rao, Regina J Brown, Elizabeth P Ryan

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current nutrition and food science, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01929122 (BENEFIT), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01929122 nacompletednot on this map

BENEFIT: Beans/Bran Enriching Nutritional Eating For Intestinal Health Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorColorado State UniversityRan2010 to 2014Enrolled29ConditionsColorectal Cancer Control and PreventionArmsPlacebo-Control Meals and Snacks, Cooked Navy Bean Powder Meals and Snacks, Rice Bran Meals and Snacks
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Erica C BorresenDepartment of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences.
Kerry A GundlachDepartment of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Colorado State University, 1680 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Melissa WdowikDepartment of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Colorado State University, 1680 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA ; Kendall Anderson Nutrition Center, Room 114 Gifford Building, Fort Collins, CO 80523.
Sangeeta RaoAnimal Population Health Institute, Department of Clinical Sciences, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Regina J BrownUniversity of Colorado Health, Cancer Center of the Rockies, Fort Collins, CO 80522, USA.
Elizabeth P RyanDepartment of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences ; Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Colorado State University, 1680 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
University of Colorado Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEmerging evidence supports that increased consumption of dry beans (

methodsSeven meals and six snacks were developed for both the absence and inclusion of cooked navy bean powder (35grams/day). Sixteen healthy adults (7 non-cancer and 9 CRC survivors) completed the placebo-controlled, randomized, single-blinded dietary intervention trial. Participants consumed one study-provided meal and snack daily for 28 days, which accounted for approximately one-third of their total recommended caloric intake (meals = 202-483 kcal and snacks = 194-401 kcal). Participants also recorded three-day dietary food logs each week.

resultsThe addition of 35g of cooked navy bean powder (NBP) into foods provided 5-8% daily caloric intake. The compliance to the meal and snack intervention ranged from 89-100%. Non-cancer participants in the NBP group had a significant decrease in total caloric intake after week 4 (p≤0.0001). CRC survivors in the NBP group significantly increased total fiber intake by week 4 (p≤0.0001).

conclusionsNBP are feasible to include in meals for increased total fiber intake and for consuming the amount that is associated with CRC chemoprevention outcomes. These findings warrant further evaluation of NBP consumption in clinical nutrition trials for CRC control and prevention.

Indexed as

Colorectal cancerdietary fiberdietary practicesfunctional foodslegumesnavy beansnutritionPhaseolus vulgaris L.

Identifiers

PMID25009453
PMCPMC4082309
OpenAlexW2134930168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.