ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2014
Endoscopic full-thickness resection and laparoscopic surgery for treatment of gastric stromal tumors.
Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04751591 (Prospective Randomized Controlled Multicenter Clinical Trial For Comparison Of Safety Between Endoscopic Resection And Laparoscopic Partial Gastrectomy In Patients With 2-5cm Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prospective Randomized Controlled Multicenter Clinical Trial For Comparison Of Safety Between Endoscopic Resection And Laparoscopic Partial Gastrectomy In Patients With 2-5cm Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Subepithelial Lesion Observed in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Guideline
- What About Gastric Schwannoma? A Review Article.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2021Pooled it
- Comparison Among Endoscopic, Laparoscopic, and Open Resection for Relatively Small Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (<5 cm): A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Pooled it
- Comparison of Endoscopic Cap External Snare Resection (ECESR) and Endoscopic Muscularis Dissection (EMD) for Small Gastric Submucosal Tumors (≤ 12 mm) Emerging from the Muscularis propria.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
- Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Subepithelial Lesions Observed in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2025Review
- Natural Course of Gastric Subepithelial Tumors.The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2025Review
- Endoscopic full-thickness resectionWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Unveiling a novel model of cell senescence-related genes for prognostic assessment and immunotherapeutic insights in gastric cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Risk factors for conversion from endoscopic resection to laparoscopic resection for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors.The Journal of international medical research · 2023Article
- Lap-Endo cooperative surgery (LECS) in gastric GIST: updates and future advances.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Review
- Comparison of efficacy and safety between endoscopic and laparoscopic resections in the treatment of gastric stromal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2022Article
- Comparable long-term survival of patients with colorectal or gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors treated with endoscopic vs. surgical resection.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Article
- Clinical outcomes of endoscopic resection for the treatment of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors originating from the muscularis propria: a 7-year experience from a large tertiary center in China.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Article
- Endoscopic submucosal excavation and endoscopic full-thickness resection for gastric schwannoma: five-year experience from a large tertiary center in China.Surgical endoscopy · 2020Article
- Direct endoscopic full-thickness resection for submucosal tumors with an intraluminal growth pattern originating from the muscularis propria layer in the gastric fundus.BMC gastroenterology · 2020Article
- Clinical evaluation of endoscopic resection for treatment of large gastric stromal tumors.World journal of clinical cases · 2019Article
- Comparison between submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection and endoscopic full-thickness resection for gastric stromal tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer.Surgical endoscopy · 2017Article
- Evolving role of the endoscopist in management of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors.World journal of gastroenterology · 2017Article
- Gastric Schwannoma: A Tumor Must Be Included in Differential Diagnoses of Gastric Submucosal Tumors.Case reports in gastrointestinal medicine · 2017Article
- Endoscopic resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo assess the effectiveness of endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFR) and laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of gastric stromal tumors arising from the muscularis propria.
methodsOut of 62 gastric stromal tumors arising from the muscularis propria, each > 1.5 cm in diameter, 32 were removed by EFR, and 30 were removed by laparoscopic surgery. The tumor expression of CD34, CD117, Dog-1, S-100, and SMA was assessed immunohistochemically. The operative time, complete resection rate, length of hospital stay, incidence of complications, and recurrence rate were compared between the two groups. Continuous data were compared using independent samples t-tests, and categorical data were compared using χ (2) tests.
resultsThe 32 gastric stromal tumors treated by EFR and the 30 treated by laparoscopic surgery showed similar operative time [20-155 min (mean, 78.5 ± 30.1 min) vs 50-120 min (mean, 80.9 ± 46.7 min), P > 0.05], complete resection rate (100% vs 93.3%, P > 0.05), and length of hospital stay [4-10 d (mean, 5.9 ± 1.4 d) vs 4-19 d (mean, 8.9 ± 3.2 d), P >0.05]. None of the patients treated by EFR experienced complications, whereas two patients treated by laparoscopy required a conversion to laparotomy, and one patient had postoperative gastroparesis. No recurrences were observed in either group. Immunohistochemical staining showed that of the 62 gastric stromal tumors diagnosed by gastroscopy and endoscopic ultrasound, six were leiomyomas (SMA-positive), one was a schwannoglioma (S-100 positive), and the remaining 55 were stromal tumors.
conclusionSome gastric stromal tumors arising from the muscularis propria can be completely removed by EFR. EFR could likely replace surgical or laparoscopic procedures for the removal of gastric stromal tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.