Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25009381›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2014

Metabolomic studies of human gastric cancer: review.

Naresh Doni Jayavelu, Nadav S Bar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Targeted metabolomic profiling of gastric cancer biopsies.The Indian journal of medical research · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. PlasmaCancer biology & medicine · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Naresh Doni JayaveluNaresh Doni Jayavelu, Nadav S Bar, Department of Chemical Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N7491 Trondheim, Norway.
Nadav S BarNaresh Doni Jayavelu, Nadav S Bar, Department of Chemical Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N7491 Trondheim, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metabolomics is a field of study in systems biology that involves the identification and quantification of metabolites present in a biological system. Analyzing metabolic differences between unperturbed and perturbed networks, such as cancerous and non-cancerous samples, can provide insight into underlying disease pathology, disease prognosis and diagnosis. Despite the large number of review articles concerning metabolomics and its application in cancer research, biomarker and drug discovery, these reviews do not focus on a specific type of cancer. Metabolomics may provide biomarkers useful for identification of early stage gastric cancer, potentially addressing an important clinical need. Here, we present a short review on metabolomics as a tool for biomarker discovery in human gastric cancer, with a primary focus on its use as a predictor of anticancer drug chemosensitivity, diagnosis, prognosis, and metastasis.

Indexed as

MetabolomicsAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorHumansPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisStomach NeoplasmsSystems BiologyAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorBiomarkersChemosensitivityGastric cancerLiquid/gas chromatography and mass spectrometryMetabolomicsMetastasisNuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy

Identifiers

PMID25009381
PMCPMC4081680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.