Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25009270›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2014

Distinct neuronal interactions in anterior inferotemporal areas of macaque monkeys during retrieval of object association memory.

Toshiyuki Hirabayashi, Keita Tamura, Daigo Takeuchi, Masaki Takeda, Kenji W Koyano, Yasushi Miyashita

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Disentangling Semantic Composition and Semantic Association in the Left Temporal Lobe.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Time-resolved neural reinstatement and pattern separation during memory decisions in human hippocampus.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Toshiyuki HirabayashiDepartment of Physiology, The University of Tokyo School of Medicine, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan thirabay@m.u-tokyo.ac.jp.
Keita TamuraDepartment of Physiology, The University of Tokyo School of Medicine, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.
Daigo TakeuchiDepartment of Physiology, The University of Tokyo School of Medicine, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.
Masaki TakedaDepartment of Physiology, The University of Tokyo School of Medicine, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.
Kenji W KoyanoDepartment of Physiology, The University of Tokyo School of Medicine, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.
Yasushi MiyashitaDepartment of Physiology, The University of Tokyo School of Medicine, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In macaque monkeys, the anterior inferotemporal cortex, a region crucial for object memory processing, is composed of two adjacent, hierarchically distinct areas, TE and 36, for which different functional roles and neuronal responses in object memory tasks have been characterized. However, it remains unknown how the neuronal interactions differ between these areas during memory retrieval. Here, we conducted simultaneous recordings from multiple single-units in each of these areas while monkeys performed an object association memory task and examined the inter-area differences in neuronal interactions during the delay period. Although memory neurons showing sustained activity for the presented cue stimulus, cue-holding (CH) neurons, interacted with each other in both areas, only those neurons in area 36 interacted with another type of memory neurons coding for the to-be-recalled paired associate (pair-recall neurons) during memory retrieval. Furthermore, pairs of CH neurons in area TE showed functional coupling in response to each individual object during memory retention, whereas the same class of neuron pairs in area 36 exhibited a comparable strength of coupling in response to both associated objects. These results suggest predominant neuronal interactions in area 36 during the mnemonic processing, which may underlie the pivotal role of this brain area in both storage and retrieval of object association memory.

Indexed as

CuesAnimalsAssociation LearningMacaca mulattaMaleMental RecallNerve NetPattern Recognition, VisualSensory Receptor CellsSynaptic TransmissionTemporal Lobeassociative object memorycell assemblycoherenceinferior temporal cortexmacaque monkeymultiple single-unit recordings

Identifiers

PMID25009270
PMCPMC6608356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.