ArticleJournal of chemical ecology2014
Efficacy and mechanisms of communication disruption of the red clover casebearer moth (Coleophora deauratella) with complete and partial pheromone formulations.
Article in Journal of chemical ecology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Challenges of pheromone-based mating disruption ofJournal of pest science · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The red clover casebearer, Coleophora deauratella Leinig and Zeller (Lepidoptera: Coleophoridae), is a major pest of red clover (Trifolium pratense L.) grown for seed in Canada and parts of Europe. Insecticides are ineffective against C. deauratella, and other control methods, such as pheromone-mediated mating disruption, need to be explored. The efficacy and mechanisms of communication disruption were evaluated in small-plot trials (0.25 ha) with reservoir-type rope dispensers loaded with either the complete pheromone blend [10:1 ratio of (Z)-7-dodecenyl acetate: (Z)-5-dodecenyl acetate] or the major component alone [(Z)-7-dodecenyl acetate]. Both formulations reduced catches of male C. deauratella in pheromone traps (>99.6 %). In pheromone-treated plots, more males were caught on yellow sticky cards near dispensers that released the complete pheromone blend, than on cards near dispensers releasing the major component. In the laboratory, after pre-exposure to either the complete blend or the major component for 1 h, male C. deauratella antennae became adapted, as measured by electroantennograms conducted 5 min. after treatment. Adaptation due to pre-exposure to either formulation resulted in a shift in the pheromone response threshold; antennae from pre-exposed moths responded more strongly to high pheromone dosages (5-50 μg) than did antennae from untreated control moths. Antennae from moths held in clean air for 24 h after pre-exposure recovered and responded similarly to pheromone as antennae from control moths. These results suggest that both formulations have the potential to disrupt pheromone communication in C. Deauratella, but that the disruption mechanisms of the two formulations likely differ.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.