ReviewDeutsches Arzteblatt international2014
Treatment resistant hypertension--investigation and conservative management.
Review in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fixed-dose vs free-dose combinations for the management of hypertension-An analysis of 81 958 patients.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2018Article
- The function and regulation of acid-sensing ion channels (ASICs) and the epithelial Na(+) channel (ENaC): IUPHAR Review 19.British journal of pharmacology · 2016Review
- [Resistant hypertension : What is it?].Der Internist · 2015Article
- In reply.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2015Article
- Better risk assessment for individual substances.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2015Article
- [Therapy-resistant hypertension].Der Internist · 2015Article
- Carotid Baroreceptor Stimulation and Arteriovenous Shunts for Resistant Hypertension.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journalReview
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on byIn reply.2015
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe introduction of invasive treatments, some of which are irreversible, for the entity called treatment-resistant hypertension (TRH) creates the need for a comprehensive discussion of the diagnostic evaluation that TRH requires and the available options for its conservative treatment.
methodThe pertinent literature is selectively reviewed in the light of the authors' longstanding clinical experience.
resultsOur review of the literature suggests that the high prevalence of TRH in Germany (ca. 20%) can be nearly halved with the aid of more thorough diagnostic evaluation. Such an evaluation should include a review of the patient's antihypertensive drugs (adherence, daily dosing, concomitant medication), investigation for other vascular changes that might affect blood pressure measurement, and exclusion of white-coat hypertension, sleep apnea syndrome, and secondary rather than essential hypertension. As there have been no randomized trials of treatment for TRH, the physician confronted with such cases must devise treatments on the basis of observational data and pathophysiological reasoning (volume status considering renin levels, sympathetic blockade, vasodilatation). Such measures can presumably lower the number of truly treatment-resistant cases still further.
conclusionTo save patients from preventable harm, patients should undergo a thorough diagnostic evaluation and-under close monitoring for side effects-conservative pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments should be deployed before any invasive treatment is performed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.