Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25008052›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2014

Identification of an ideal-like fingerprint for a protein fold using overlapped conserved residues based approach.

Amit Goyal, Sriram Sokalingam, Kyu-Suk Hwang, Sun-Gu Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amit GoyalSchool of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan, Korea 609-735.
Sriram SokalingamSchool of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan, Korea 609-735.
Kyu-Suk HwangSchool of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan, Korea 609-735.
Sun-Gu LeeSchool of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan, Korea 609-735.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Design of an efficient fingerprint that detects homologous proteins at distant sequence identity has been a great challenge. This paper proposes a strategy to extract an ideal-like fingerprint with high specificity and sensitivity from a group of sequences related to a fold. The approach is devised based on the assumptions that the critical residues for a protein fold may be conserved in three aspects, i.e. sequence, structure, and intramolecular interaction, and embedded in secondary structures. We hypothesized that the residues satisfying such conditions simultaneously may work as an efficient fingerprint. This idea was tested on protein folds of various classes, such as beta-strand rich, alpha + beta proteins and alpha/beta proteins with discrete sequence similarities. The fingerprint for each fold was generated by selecting the overlapped conserved residues (OCR) from the conserved residues obtained using independent three alignment methods, i.e. multiple sequence alignment, structure-based alignment, and alignment based on the interstrand hydrogen-bonds. The OCR fingerprints showed more than 90% detection efficiency for all the folds tested and were identified to be almost the minimal fingerprints composed of only critical residues. This study is expected to provide an important conceptual improvement in the identification or design of ideal fingerprints for a protein fold.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAmino Acid SequenceConserved SequenceHydrogen BondingMolecular Sequence DataProtein FoldingProteinsProtein Structure, SecondarySensitivity and SpecificitySequence AlignmentSequence Analysis, ProteinSequence Homology, Amino AcidProteins

Identifiers

PMID25008052
PMCPMC4090624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.