Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25007868›Full record

Trial reportEuropean radiology2014

Reducing radiation dose in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and lower tube potential in computed tomography.

David Kaul, Ulrich Grupp, Johannes Kahn, Pirus Ghadjar, Edzard Wiener, Bernd Hamm, Florian Streitparth

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European radiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Low-dose computed tomography with 4World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2017
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

David KaulDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Charité School of Medicine and University Hospital, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany, david.kaul@charite.de.
Ulrich Grupp
Johannes Kahn
Pirus Ghadjar
Edzard Wiener
Bernd Hamm
Florian Streitparth

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess the impact of ASIR (adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction) and lower tube potential on dose reduction and image quality in chest computed tomography angiographies (CTAs) of patients with pulmonary embolism. MATERIALS AND

methodsCT data from 44 patients with pulmonary embolism were acquired using different protocols-Group A: 120 kV, filtered back projection, n = 12; Group B: 120 kV, 40 % ASIR, n = 12; Group C: 100 kV, 40 % ASIR, n = 12 and Group D: 80 kV, 40 % ASIR, n = 8. Normalised effective dose was calculated; image quality was assessed quantitatively and qualitatively.

resultsNormalised effective dose in Group B was 33.8 % lower than in Group A (p = 0.014) and 54.4 % lower in Group C than in Group A (p < 0.001). Group A, B and C did not show significant differences in qualitative or quantitative analysis of image quality. Group D showed significantly higher noise levels in qualitative and quantitative analysis, significantly more artefacts and decreased overall diagnosability. Best results, considering dose reduction and image quality, were achieved in Group C.

conclusionsThe combination of ASIR and lower tube potential is an option to reduce radiation without significant worsening of image quality in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. KEY POINTS: • Iterative algorithms and lowering of tube potential reduce radiation without compromising interpretability • 40 % ASIR and 100 kV tube potential led to a 54.4 % dose reduction • 40 % ASIR and 80 kV tube potential led to significantly worse image quality.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAgedArtifactsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPulmonary EmbolismRadiation DosageRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedReproducibility of ResultsTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.