Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25007422›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie2014

Incentives and disincentives for the treatment of depression and anxiety: a scoping review.

Rachelle Ashcroft, Jose Silveira, Brian Rush, Kwame Mckenzie

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Evaluation of Australia's Better Access initiative: An overview.The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. A Scoping Review of Interventions for the Treatment of Eco-Anxiety.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Patient perspectives on quality of care for depression and anxiety in primary health care teams: A qualitative study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Support, patience, and expectancy: therapeutic options alongside intensified treatments for depression?Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rachelle AshcroftPostdoctoral Fellow, Social Aetiology of Mental Illness Training Program, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario; Assistant Professor, School of Social Work, Renison University College, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario.
Jose SilveiraChief of Psychiatry, Medical Director, Mental Health and Addiction Program, St Joseph's Health Centre, Toronto, Ontario; Assistant Professor, Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.
Brian RushSenior Scientist, Health Equity Research Group, Social and Epidemiological Research Department, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario; Professor, Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario; Associate Professor, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.
Kwame MckenzieMedical Director of Underserved Populations Program, Centre for Addictions and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario; Professor of Psychiatry, University of Toronto: Director of Division of Equity, Gender and Populations, Toronto, Ontario; Director of Canadian Institutes of Health Research Social Aetiology of Mental Illness Training Program, Toronto, Ontario; President, Canadian Mental Health Association Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThere is widespread support for primary care to help address growing mental health care demands. Incentives and disincentives are widely used in the design of health care systems to help steer toward desired goals. The absence of a conceptual model to help understand the range of factors that influence the provision of primary mental health care inspired a scoping review of the literature. Understanding the incentives that promote and the disincentives that deter treatment for depression and anxiety in the primary care context will help to achieve goals of greater access to mental health care.

methodA review of the literature was conducted to answer the question, how are incentives and disincentives conceptualized in studies investigating the treatment of common mental disorders in primary care? A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Google Scholar was undertaken using Arksey and O'Malley's 5-stage methodological framework for scoping reviews.

resultsWe identified 27 studies. A range of incentives and disincentives influence the success of primary mental health care initiatives to treat depression and anxiety. Six types of incentives and disincentives can encourage or discourage treatment of depression and anxiety in primary care: attitudes and beliefs, training and core competencies, leadership, organizational, financial, and systemic.

conclusionsUnderstanding that there are 6 different types of incentives that influence treatment for anxiety and depression in primary care may help service planners who are trying to promote improved mental health care.

Indexed as

MotivationPrimary Health CareAnxiety DisordersAttitude of Health PersonnelClinical CompetenceDepressive DisorderEnglandHumansState Medicine

Identifiers

PMID25007422
PMCPMC4086319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.