Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25006986›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2014

Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging-compatible optical detectors for in-magnet tissue spectroscopy: photodiodes versus silicon photomultipliers.

Fadi El-Ghussein, Shudong Jiang, Brian W Pogue, Keith D Paulsen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 91% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fadi El-Ghussein
Shudong Jiang
Brian W Pogue
Keith D Paulsen
Dartmouth College · US

Funding

Translational Engineering in Cancer (TEC)P30CA023108 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Steven D Leach · 1985 to 2026
$91.3M
Fluorescence Imaging to Optimize Cancer TherapyR01CA109558 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI POGUE, BRIAN WILLIAM · 2005 to 2015
$2.8M
FREQUENCY DOMAIN OPTICAL IMAGING OF BREAST CANCERR01CA069544 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI PAULSEN, KEITH D. · 1996 to 2012
$2.4M
Monitoring Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Responses with NIR TomographyR01CA176086 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI JIANG, SHUDONG · 2014 to 2018
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023108NCI NIH HHS R01 CA069544NCI NIH HHS R01 CA109558NCI NIH HHS R01 CA176086NCI NIH HHS R01CA176086
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tissue spectroscopy inside the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system adds a significant value by measuring fast vascular hemoglobin responses or completing spectroscopic identification of diagnostically relevant molecules. Advances in this type of spectroscopy instrumentation have largely focused on fiber coupling into and out of the MRI; however, nonmagnetic detectors can now be placed inside the scanner with signal amplification performed remotely to the high field environment for optimized light detection. In this study, the two possible detector options, such as silicon photodiodes (PD) and silicon photomultipliers (SiPM), were systematically examined for dynamic range and wavelength performance. Results show that PDs offer 10⁸(160 dB) dynamic range with sensitivity down to 1 pW, whereas SiPMs have 10⁷(140 dB) dynamic range and sensitivity down to 10 pW. A second major difference is the spectral sensitivity of the two detectors. Here, wavelengths in the 940 nm range are efficiently captured by PDs (but not SiPMs), likely making them the superior choice for broadband spectroscopy guided by MRI.

Indexed as

Equipment DesignMagnetic Resonance ImagingOptical ImagingPhantoms, ImagingSiliconSpectrum AnalysisSilicon

Identifiers

PMID25006986
PMCPMC4160972
OpenAlexW1981623788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.