Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25006547›Full record

ArticleEJNMMI research2014

A (90)Y-labelled anti-ROBO1 monoclonal antibody exhibits antitumour activity against hepatocellular carcinoma xenografts during ROBO1-targeted radioimmunotherapy.

Kentaro Fujiwara, Keitaro Koyama, Kosuke Suga, Masako Ikemura, Yasutaka Saito, Akihiro Hino, Hiroko Iwanari, Osamu Kusano-Arai, Kenichi Mitsui, Hiroyuki Kasahara and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJNMMI research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Intratumoral Injection ofFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2019
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kentaro FujiwaraDepartment of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 3-1, Hongo 7-Chome, Bunkyo-ku 113-8655, Tokyo, Japan.
Keitaro KoyamaDepartment of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 3-1, Hongo 7-Chome, Bunkyo-ku 113-8655, Tokyo, Japan.
Kosuke SugaSANKYO LABO SERVICE Co., Ltd., 2-13-16, Nishiichinoe, Edogawaku 132-0023, Tokyo, Japan.
Masako IkemuraDepartment of Pathology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 3-1, Hongo 7-Chome, Bunkyo-ku 113-8655, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasutaka SaitoFUJIFILM RI Pharma Co., Ltd., 453-1, Shimo-Okura, Matsuo-Machi, Sammu-City 289-1592, Chiba, Japan.
Akihiro HinoFUJIFILM RI Pharma Co., Ltd., 453-1, Shimo-Okura, Matsuo-Machi, Sammu-City 289-1592, Chiba, Japan.
Hiroko IwanariDepartment of Quantitative Biology and Medicine, Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, 4-6-1 Komaba, Meguro-ku 153-8904, Tokyo, Japan.
Osamu Kusano-AraiDepartment of Quantitative Biology and Medicine, Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, 4-6-1 Komaba, Meguro-ku 153-8904, Tokyo, Japan ; Institute of Immunology Co., Ltd., 1-1-1 Koraku, Bunkyo 112-0004, Tokyo, Japan.
Kenichi MitsuiDepartment of Quantitative Biology and Medicine, Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, 4-6-1 Komaba, Meguro-ku 153-8904, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroyuki KasaharaFUJIFILM RI Pharma Co., Ltd., 453-1, Shimo-Okura, Matsuo-Machi, Sammu-City 289-1592, Chiba, Japan.
Masashi FukayamaDepartment of Pathology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 3-1, Hongo 7-Chome, Bunkyo-ku 113-8655, Tokyo, Japan.
Tatsuhiko KodamaDepartment of Systems Biology and Medicine, Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, 4-6-1 Komaba, Meguro-ku 153-8904, Tokyo, Japan.
Takao HamakuboDepartment of Quantitative Biology and Medicine, Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, 4-6-1 Komaba, Meguro-ku 153-8904, Tokyo, Japan.
Toshimitsu MomoseDepartment of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 3-1, Hongo 7-Chome, Bunkyo-ku 113-8655, Tokyo, Japan.
The University of Tokyo · JPFujifilm (Japan) · JPDaiichi-Sankyo (Japan) · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundROBO1 is a membrane protein that functions in axon guidance. ROBO1 contributes to tumour metastasis and angiogenesis and may have potential as a target protein of immunotherapy because ROBO1 is specifically expressed at high levels in hepatocellular carcinoma. In this study, we examined biodistribution and radioimmunotherapy (RIT) using a radioisotope-labelled anti-ROBO1 monoclonal antibody (MAb) against hepatocellular carcinoma models.

methodsROBO1-positive HepG2 human hepatocellular carcinoma xenograft nude mice were used in this study. We conjugated anti-ROBO1 MAb with 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid (DOTA), and the conjugates were labelled with (111)In and (90)Y. To study biodistribution, the (111)In-DOTA-anti-ROBO1 MAb was injected into HepG2 xenograft mice via the tail vein. To evaluate any antitumour effect, a RIT study was performed, and the (90)Y-DOTA-anti-ROBO1 MAb was injected via the tail vein. Tumour volume, mouse weight, and blood cell count were periodically measured throughout the experiments. The tumours and organs of mice were collected, and a histopathological analysis was carried out.

resultsThe tumour uptake of (111)In-anti-ROBO1 MAb in HepG2 xenograft mice was 15.0% ± 0.69% injected dose per gram at 48 h after injection. Immunotherapy with cold-anti-ROBO1 MAb (70 μg) did not cause a significant antitumour effect. RIT with 6.7 MBq of (90)Y-anti-ROBO1 MAb caused significant tumour growth suppression. Transient body weight loss and bone-marrow suppression were observed. Histopathological analyses of tumours revealed the fatal degeneration of tumour cells, significant reduction of the Ki-67 index, and an increase of the apoptosis index. Normal organs showed no significant injury, but a transient reduction of hematopoietic cells was observed in the spleen and in the sternal bone marrow.

conclusionsThese results suggest that RIT with (90)Y-anti-ROBO1 MAb is a promising treatment for ROBO1-positive hepatocellular carcinoma.

Indexed as

90YBiodistributionHepatocellular carcinomaRadioimmunotherapyROBO1

Identifiers

PMID25006547
PMCPMC4077627
OpenAlexW2120684205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.