Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25006457›Full record

ReviewMultidisciplinary respiratory medicine2014

Swallowing disorders in tracheostomised patients: a multidisciplinary/multiprofessional approach in decannulation protocols.

Giancarlo Garuti, Cristina Reverberi, Angelo Briganti, Monica Massobrio, Francesco Lombardi, Mirco Lusuardi

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Multidisciplinary respiratory medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06888219 (REhabilitation of Dysphagia with ACupuncture and AuriculoTherapy in Non-communicative Patients with Severe Acquired Brain Injury), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06888219 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

REhabilitation of Dysphagia with ACupuncture and AuriculoTherapy in Non-communicative Patients with Severe Acquired Brain Injury (REDACT-Study): a Pilot Controlled Randomized Double Blinded Trial Study Protocol

TypeinterventionalSponsorFondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ETSRan2024 to 2026Enrolled24ConditionsBrain Injury, Cognitive Impairment, Deglutition DisorderArmsAcupuncture and Auricolotherapy, Conventional logopedic rehabilitation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evaluating the safety of oral methylene blue during swallowing assessment: a systematic review.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Neurorehabilitation Clinical Pathways in Stroke: The Padova Model.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Post-extubation Assessment of Laryngeal Symptoms and Severity (PALSS) in the Intensive Care Unit: Protocol of a Prospective Cohort Study.ORL-head and neck nursing : official journal of the Society of Otorhinolaryngology and Head-Neck Nurses · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. I Feel! Therefore, I Am from Pain to Consciousness in DOC Patients.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Giancarlo GarutiRespiratory Rehabilitation, S. Sebastiano Hospital, AUSL Reggio Emilia, I-42015 Correggio, RE, Italy.
Cristina ReverberiNeurological Rehabilitation, S. Sebastiano Hospital, AUSL Reggio Emilia, Correggio, RE, Italy.
Angelo BrigantiNeurological Rehabilitation, S. Sebastiano Hospital, AUSL Reggio Emilia, Correggio, RE, Italy.
Monica MassobrioRespiratory Rehabilitation, S. Sebastiano Hospital, AUSL Reggio Emilia, I-42015 Correggio, RE, Italy.
Francesco LombardiRespiratory Rehabilitation, S. Sebastiano Hospital, AUSL Reggio Emilia, I-42015 Correggio, RE, Italy.
Mirco LusuardiRespiratory Rehabilitation, S. Sebastiano Hospital, AUSL Reggio Emilia, I-42015 Correggio, RE, Italy.
Azienda Sanitaria Unità Locale di Reggio Emilia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Safe removal of tracheal cannula is a major goal in the rehabilitation of tracheostomised patients to achieve progressive independence from mechanical support and reduce the risk of respiratory complications. A tracheal cannula may also cause significant discomfort to the patient, making verbal communication difficult. Particularly when cuffed, tracheal cannula reduces the normal movement of the larynx which can further compromise the basic swallowing defect. A close connection between respiratory, phonating, swallowing and feeding abilities to be recovered, implies a strict integration among different professionals of the rehabilitation team. An appropriate management of tracheostomy cannula is closely connected with assessment and treatment of swallowing disorders in order to limit the development of severe pulmonary and nutritional complications, but at present there are no uniform protocols in the scientific literature. Furthermore, several studies report as an essential criterion for decannulation the presence of good patient consciousness, which is often altered in patients with tracheostomy, but a general agreement is lacking.

Indexed as

DysphagiaSwallowingTracheostomy cannula

Identifiers

PMID25006457
PMCPMC4086992
OpenAlexW2154274274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.