Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25006026›Full record

ArticlePlant physiology2014

TRICHOME BIREFRINGENCE-LIKE27 affects aluminum sensitivity by modulating the O-acetylation of xyloglucan and aluminum-binding capacity in Arabidopsis.

Xiao Fang Zhu, Ying Sun, Bao Cai Zhang, Nasim Mansoori, Jiang Xue Wan, Yu Liu, Zhi Wei Wang, Yuan Zhi Shi, Yi Hua Zhou, Shao Jian Zheng

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant physiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Comprehensive characterization of potatoFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Plant Cell Wall PolysaccharidePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. The upstream regulation of the root cell wall whenPlant signaling & behavior · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Expression GWAS ofFrontiers in plant science · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Xiao Fang ZhuState Key Laboratory of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, College of Life Sciences (X.F.Z., Y.S, J.X.W., Y.L., Z.W.W., S.J.Z.), and State Key Laboratory of Plant Genomics, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology (B.C.Z., Y.H.Z), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;Department of Plant and Microbial Biology University of California, Berkeley, California, 94720 (N.M.);Department of Plant Physiology and Nutrition, Tea Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Tea Chemical Engineering, Ministry of Agriculture, Hangzhou 310008, China (Y.Z.S.).
Ying SunState Key Laboratory of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, College of Life Sciences (X.F.Z., Y.S, J.X.W., Y.L., Z.W.W., S.J.Z.), and State Key Laboratory of Plant Genomics, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology (B.C.Z., Y.H.Z), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;Department of Plant and Microbial Biology University of California, Berkeley, California, 94720 (N.M.);Department of Plant Physiology and Nutrition, Tea Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Tea Chemical Engineering, Ministry of Agriculture, Hangzhou 310008, China (Y.Z.S.).
Bao Cai ZhangState Key Laboratory of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, College of Life Sciences (X.F.Z., Y.S, J.X.W., Y.L., Z.W.W., S.J.Z.), and State Key Laboratory of Plant Genomics, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology (B.C.Z., Y.H.Z), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;Department of Plant and Microbial Biology University of California, Berkeley, California, 94720 (N.M.);Department of Plant Physiology and Nutrition, Tea Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Tea Chemical Engineering, Ministry of Agriculture, Hangzhou 310008, China (Y.Z.S.).
Nasim MansooriState Key Laboratory of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, College of Life Sciences (X.F.Z., Y.S, J.X.W., Y.L., Z.W.W., S.J.Z.), and State Key Laboratory of Plant Genomics, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology (B.C.Z., Y.H.Z), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;Department of Plant and Microbial Biology University of California, Berkeley, California, 94720 (N.M.);Department of Plant Physiology and Nutrition, Tea Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Tea Chemical Engineering, Ministry of Agriculture, Hangzhou 310008, China (Y.Z.S.).
Jiang Xue WanState Key Laboratory of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, College of Life Sciences (X.F.Z., Y.S, J.X.W., Y.L., Z.W.W., S.J.Z.), and State Key Laboratory of Plant Genomics, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology (B.C.Z., Y.H.Z), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;Department of Plant and Microbial Biology University of California, Berkeley, California, 94720 (N.M.);Department of Plant Physiology and Nutrition, Tea Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Tea Chemical Engineering, Ministry of Agriculture, Hangzhou 310008, China (Y.Z.S.).
Yu LiuState Key Laboratory of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, College of Life Sciences (X.F.Z., Y.S, J.X.W., Y.L., Z.W.W., S.J.Z.), and State Key Laboratory of Plant Genomics, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology (B.C.Z., Y.H.Z), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;Department of Plant and Microbial Biology University of California, Berkeley, California, 94720 (N.M.);Department of Plant Physiology and Nutrition, Tea Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Tea Chemical Engineering, Ministry of Agriculture, Hangzhou 310008, China (Y.Z.S.).
Zhi Wei WangState Key Laboratory of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, College of Life Sciences (X.F.Z., Y.S, J.X.W., Y.L., Z.W.W., S.J.Z.), and State Key Laboratory of Plant Genomics, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology (B.C.Z., Y.H.Z), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;Department of Plant and Microbial Biology University of California, Berkeley, California, 94720 (N.M.);Department of Plant Physiology and Nutrition, Tea Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Tea Chemical Engineering, Ministry of Agriculture, Hangzhou 310008, China (Y.Z.S.).
Yuan Zhi ShiState Key Laboratory of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, College of Life Sciences (X.F.Z., Y.S, J.X.W., Y.L., Z.W.W., S.J.Z.), and State Key Laboratory of Plant Genomics, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology (B.C.Z., Y.H.Z), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;Department of Plant and Microbial Biology University of California, Berkeley, California, 94720 (N.M.);Department of Plant Physiology and Nutrition, Tea Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Tea Chemical Engineering, Ministry of Agriculture, Hangzhou 310008, China (Y.Z.S.).
Yi Hua ZhouState Key Laboratory of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, College of Life Sciences (X.F.Z., Y.S, J.X.W., Y.L., Z.W.W., S.J.Z.), and State Key Laboratory of Plant Genomics, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology (B.C.Z., Y.H.Z), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;Department of Plant and Microbial Biology University of California, Berkeley, California, 94720 (N.M.);Department of Plant Physiology and Nutrition, Tea Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Tea Chemical Engineering, Ministry of Agriculture, Hangzhou 310008, China (Y.Z.S.).
Shao Jian ZhengState Key Laboratory of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, College of Life Sciences (X.F.Z., Y.S, J.X.W., Y.L., Z.W.W., S.J.Z.), and State Key Laboratory of Plant Genomics, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology (B.C.Z., Y.H.Z), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;Department of Plant and Microbial Biology University of California, Berkeley, California, 94720 (N.M.);Department of Plant Physiology and Nutrition, Tea Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Tea Chemical Engineering, Ministry of Agriculture, Hangzhou 310008, China (Y.Z.S.) sjzheng@zju.edu.cn.
Zhejiang University · CNState Key Laboratory of Plant Physiology and BiochemistryChinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNChinese Academy of Sciences · CNState Key Laboratory of Plant Genomics · CNUniversity of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Xyloglucan (XyG) has been reported to contribute to the aluminum (Al)-binding capacity of the cell wall in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). However, the influence of O-acetylation of XyG, accomplished by the putative O-acetyltransferase TRICHOME BIREFRINGENCE-LIKE27 (TBL27 [AXY4]), on its Al-binding capacity is not known. In this study, we found that the two corresponding TBL27 mutants, axy4-1 and axy4-3, were more Al sensitive than wild-type Columbia-0 plants. TBL27 was expressed in roots as well as in leaves, stems, flowers, and siliques. Upon Al treatment, even within 30 min, TBL27 transcript accumulation was strongly down-regulated. The mutants axy4-1 and axy4-3 accumulated significantly more Al in the root and wall, which could not be correlated with pectin content or pectin methylesterase activity, as no difference in the mutants was observed compared with the wild type when exposed to Al stress. The increased Al accumulation in the wall of the mutants was found to be in the hemicellulose fraction. While the total sugar content of the hemicellulose fraction did not change, the O-acetylation level of XyG was reduced by Al treatment. Taken together, we conclude that modulation of the O-acetylation level of XyG influences the Al sensitivity in Arabidopsis by affecting the Al-binding capacity in the hemicellulose.

Indexed as

AcetylationAluminumArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsCell WallGlucansHolliday Junction ResolvasesPlant RootsPolysaccharidesXylansAluminumArabidopsis ProteinsGlucanshemicelluloseHolliday Junction ResolvasesPolysaccharidesTRICHOME BIREFRINGENCE-LIKE27 protein, ArabidopsisXylansxyloglucan

Identifiers

PMID25006026
PMCPMC4149705
OpenAlexW2134381060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.