ArticleBiomedical engineering online2014
Validation of the pulse decomposition analysis algorithm using central arterial blood pressure.
Article in Biomedical engineering online, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04817137 (Validation of a Novel Non-invasive Continuous Blood Pressure Monitor in Children Ages 2- 17 Years-old), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Validation of a Novel Non-invasive Continuous Blood Pressure Monitor in Children Ages 2- 17 Years-old
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.
- D-dimer in Marfan syndrome: effect of obstructive sleep apnea induced blood pressure surges.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2022Trial
- Continuous Non-invasive finger cuff CareTaker® comparable to invasive intra-arterial pressure in patients undergoing major intra-abdominal surgery.BMC anesthesiology · 2017Trial
- Feasibility and performance evaluation of PPG on a Galaxy Watch in continuous central blood pressure monitoring.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Article
- Integration of chemical and physical inputs for monitoring metabolites and cardiac signals in diabetes.Nature biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Blunted Blood Pressure Dipping During Night Shift Work: Does It Matter? Can We Intervene?American journal of industrial medicine · 2025Article
- Cuffless Blood Pressure Monitor for Home and Hospital Use.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Review
- The 2023 wearable photoplethysmography roadmap.Physiological measurement · 2023Review
- The Promise and Illusion of Continuous, Cuffless Blood Pressure Monitoring.Current cardiology reports · 2023Review
- Assessment of pleural pressure during sleep in Marfan syndrome.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2022Article
- The Central Inflammatory Network: A Hypothalamic fMRI Study of Experimental Endotoxemia in Humans.Neuroimmunomodulation · 2022Article
- Advances in Non-Invasive Blood Pressure Monitoring.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Kinematic but not clinical measures predict falls in Parkinson-related orthostatic hypotension.Journal of neurology · 2021Article
- Blood pressure monitoring in sleep: time to wake up.Blood pressure monitoring · 2020Review
- Corrigendum: Cerebral Autoregulation Evidenced by Synchronized Low Frequency Oscillations in Blood Pressure and Resting-State fMRI.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2020Article
- Cerebral Autoregulation Evidenced by Synchronized Low Frequency Oscillations in Blood Pressure and Resting-State fMRI.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2019Article
- Reducing the number of parameters in 1D arterial blood flow modeling: less is more for patient-specific simulations.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is a significant need for continuous noninvasive blood pressure (cNIBP) monitoring, especially for anesthetized surgery and ICU recovery. cNIBP systems could lower costs and expand the use of continuous blood pressure monitoring, lowering risk and improving outcomes.The test system examined here is the CareTaker® and a pulse contour analysis algorithm, Pulse Decomposition Analysis (PDA). PDA's premise is that the peripheral arterial pressure pulse is a superposition of five individual component pressure pulses that are due to the left ventricular ejection and reflections and re-reflections from only two reflection sites within the central arteries.The hypothesis examined here is that the model's principal parameters P2P1 and T13 can be correlated with, respectively, systolic and pulse pressures.
methodsCentral arterial blood pressures of patients (38 m/25 f, mean age: 62.7 y, SD: 11.5 y, mean height: 172.3 cm, SD: 9.7 cm, mean weight: 86.8 kg, SD: 20.1 kg) undergoing cardiac catheterization were monitored using central line catheters while the PDA parameters were extracted from the arterial pulse signal obtained non-invasively using CareTaker system.
resultsQualitative validation of the model was achieved with the direct observation of the five component pressure pulses in the central arteries using central line catheters. Statistically significant correlations between P2P1 and systole and T13 and pulse pressure were established (systole: R square: 0.92 (p < 0.0001), diastole: R square: 0.78 (p < 0.0001). Bland-Altman comparisons between blood pressures obtained through the conversion of PDA parameters to blood pressures of non-invasively obtained pulse signatures with catheter-obtained blood pressures fell within the trend guidelines of the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation SP-10 standard (standard deviation: 8 mmHg(systole: 5.87 mmHg, diastole: 5.69 mmHg)).
conclusionsThe results indicate that arterial blood pressure can be accurately measured and tracked noninvasively and continuously using the CareTaker system and the PDA algorithm. The results further support the physical model that all of the features of the pressure pulse envelope, whether in the central arteries or in the arterial periphery, can be explained by the interaction of the left ventricular ejection pressure pulse with two centrally located reflection sites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.