Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25005365›Full record

ArticleMycopathologia2014

Epidemiology and antifungal susceptibilities of yeasts causing vulvovaginitis in a teaching hospital.

Soledad Gamarra, Susana Morano, Catiana Dudiuk, Estefanía Mancilla, María Elena Nardin, Emilce de Los Angeles Méndez, Guillermo Garcia-Effron

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Mycopathologia, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. An update on clinically relevant, rare, and emergingClinical microbiology reviews · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Rare Yeasts in Latin America: Uncommon Yet Meaningful.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Antifungal activity of linalool against fluconazole-resistant clinical strains of vulvovaginal Candida albicans and its predictive mechanism of action.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Biofilm Formation ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Fungal Profile of Vulvovaginal Candidiasis in a Tertiary Care Hospital.Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Soledad GamarraLaboratorio de Micología y Diagnóstico Molecular, Facultad de Bioquímica y Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Nacional del Litoral, CONICET, Ciudad Universitaria UNL (Ruta 168), C.C. 242-S3000ZAA, CP 3000, Santa Fe, Santa Fe, Argentina.
Susana Morano
Catiana Dudiuk
Estefanía Mancilla
María Elena Nardin
Emilce de Los Angeles Méndez
Guillermo Garcia-Effron
National University of the Littoral · ARConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vulvovaginal candidiasis is one of the most common mycosis. However, the information about antifungal susceptibilities of the yeasts causing this infection is scant. We studied 121 yeasts isolated from 118 patients with vulvovaginal candidiasis. The isolates were identified by phenotypic and molecular methods, including four phenotypic methods described to differentiate Candida albicans from C. dubliniensis. Antifungal susceptibility testing was performed according to CLSI documents M27A3 and M27S4 using the drugs available as treatment option in the hospital. Diabetes, any antibacterial and amoxicillin treatment were statistically linked with vulvovaginal candidiasis, while oral contraceptives were not considered a risk factor. Previous azole-based over-the-counter antifungal treatment was statistically associated with non-C.albicans yeasts infections. The most common isolated yeast species was C. albicans (85.2 %) followed by C. glabrata (5 %), Saccharomyces cerevisiae (3.3 %), and C. dubliniensis (2.5 %). Fluconazole- and itraconazole-reduced susceptibility was observed in ten and in only one C. albicans strains, respectively. All the C. glabrata isolates showed low fluconazole MICs. Clotrimazole showed excellent potency against all but seven isolates (three C. glabrata, two S. cerevisiae, one C. albicans and one Picchia anomala). Any of the strains showed nystatin reduced susceptibility. On the other hand, terbinafine was the less potent drug. Antifungal resistance is still a rare phenomenon supporting the use of azole antifungals as empirical treatment of vulvovaginal candidiasis.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnimalsAntifungal AgentsCandidaCandidiasis, VulvovaginalFemaleHospitals, TeachingHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedPregnancyRisk FactorsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeYoung AdultAntifungal Agents

Identifiers

PMID25005365
OpenAlexW1987026806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.