Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25005356›Full record

ArticleMedical education online2014

From student to steward: the Interdisciplinary Program in Neuroscience at Georgetown University as a case study in professional development during doctoral training.

Lauren Ullrich, Sonya B Dumanis, Tanya M Evans, Alexis M Jeannotte, Carrie Leonard, Summer J Rozzi, Caitlin M Taylor, Karen Gale, Jagmeet S Kanwal, Kathleen A Maguire-Zeiss and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical education online, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A Model For Teaching Advanced Neuroscience Methods: A Student-Run Seminar to Increase Practical Understanding and Confidence.Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Lauren UllrichInterdisciplinary Program in Neuroscience, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA; Department of Neurology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Sonya B DumanisInterdisciplinary Program in Neuroscience, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA; Department of Neuroscience, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Tanya M EvansInterdisciplinary Program in Neuroscience, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Alexis M JeannotteInterdisciplinary Program in Neuroscience, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular & Cellular Biology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Carrie LeonardInterdisciplinary Program in Neuroscience, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA; Department of Biology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Summer J RozziInterdisciplinary Program in Neuroscience, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA; Department of Neuroscience, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Caitlin M TaylorInterdisciplinary Program in Neuroscience, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Karen GaleInterdisciplinary Program in Neuroscience, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA; Department of Pharmacology & Physiology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Jagmeet S KanwalInterdisciplinary Program in Neuroscience, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA; Department of Neurology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA; Department of Neuroscience, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Kathleen A Maguire-ZeissInterdisciplinary Program in Neuroscience, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA; Department of Neuroscience, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Barry B WolfeInterdisciplinary Program in Neuroscience, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA; Department of Pharmacology & Physiology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Patrick A ForcelliInterdisciplinary Program in Neuroscience, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA; Department of Pharmacology & Physiology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA; paf22@georgetown.edu.

Funding

Predoctoral Training in Intergrative NeuroscienceT32NS041231 · NINDS · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI Ludise Malkova, Ashley S VanMeter · 2001 to 2026
$6.8M
Training in Neural Injury &PlasticityT32NS041218 · NINDS · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI MARK P BURNS, Kathleen Anne Maguire-Zeiss · 2001 to 2026
$3.5M
Postdoctoral Training in Developmental Disabilities ResearchT32HD046388 · NICHD · CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI VITTORIO GALLO, VITTORIO GALLO VITTORIO GALLO · 2006 to 2016
$1.5M
TRAINING PROGRAM IN DRUG ABUSET32DA007291 · NIDA · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI BAYER, BARBARA M · 1992 to 2009
$1.4M
The Effects of APOE on Neuronal NetworksF31AG043309 · NIA · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI DUMANIS, SONYA · 2012 to 2012
$30k
NIA NIH HHS F31AG043309NICHD NIH HHS T32HD46388NIDA NIH HHS T32DA007291NINDS NIH HHS T32NS041218NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS041231NINDS NIH HHS T32NS041231
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A key facet of professional development is the formation of professional identity. At its most basic level, professional identity for a scientist centers on mastery of a discipline and the development of research skills during doctoral training. To develop a broader understanding of professional identity in the context of doctoral training, the Carnegie Initiative on the Doctorate (CID) ran a multi-institutional study from 2001 to 2005. A key outcome of the CID was the development of the concept of 'stewards of the discipline'. The Interdisciplinary Program in Neuroscience (IPN) at Georgetown University participated in CID from 2003 to 2005. Here, we describe the IPN and highlight the programmatic developments resulting from participation in the CID. In particular, we emphasize programmatic activities that are designed to promote professional skills in parallel with scientific development. We describe activities in the domains of leadership, communication, teaching, public outreach, ethics, collaboration, and mentorship. Finally, we provide data that demonstrate that traditional metrics of academic success are not adversely affected by the inclusion of professional development activities in the curricula. By incorporating these seven 'professional development' activities into the required coursework and dissertation research experience, the IPN motivates students to become stewards of the discipline.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorInterprofessional RelationsProfessional RoleCommunicationFemaleHumansLeadershipMaleMentorsNeurosciencesOrganizational Case StudiesPublic RelationsResearchTeachingUniversitiescommunicationgraduate schoolleadershipneurosciencePhDprofessional developmentpublic outreachteachingtraining

Identifiers

PMID25005356
PMCPMC4087171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.