Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25005000›Full record

ReviewNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2014

Repeat-associated non-AUG translation and its impact in neurodegenerative disease.

Michael G Kearse, Peter K Todd

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Proteinopathies associated to repeat expansion disorders.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2022
    Review
  8. Translational control in aging and neurodegeneration.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNA · 2021
    Review
  9. Modeling Neurodegenerative Disorders inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Therapeutic Genome Editing for Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1 Using CRISPR/Cas9.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Michael G KearseDepartment of Neurology, University of Michigan Medical School, 4005 BSRB, 109 Zina Pitcher Place, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-2200, USA.
Peter K Todd
Department of Veterans Affairs · AUUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Research DevelopmentP30AG013283 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MILLER, RICHARD A · 1995 to 2014
$12.3M
CGG repeat associated translation in Fragile X-associated Tremor/Ataxia Syndrome-Diversity SupplementR01NS086810 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI TODD, PETER K · 2014 to 2024
$4.1M
Pathogenic Mechanisms in Fragile X Tremor Ataxia SyndromeK08NS069809 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI TODD, PETER K · 2010 to 2014
$877k
Mechanisms of CGG RAN translation in Fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndromeF32NS089124 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI KEARSE, MICHAEL G · 2014 to 2015
$108k
NIA NIH HHS 30-AG13283NIA NIH HHS P30 AG013283NINDS NIH HHS F32 NS089124NINDS NIH HHS F32NS089124NINDS NIH HHS K08 NS069809NINDS NIH HHS K08NS069809NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS086810NINDS NIH HHS R01NS086810
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nucleotide repeat expansions underlie numerous human neurological disorders. Repeats can trigger toxicity through multiple pathogenic mechanisms, including RNA gain-of-function, protein gain-of-function, and protein loss-of-function pathways. Traditionally, inference of the underlying pathogenic mechanism derives from the repeat location, with dominantly inherited repeats within transcribed noncoding sequences eliciting toxicity predominantly as RNA via sequestration of specific RNA binding proteins. However, recent findings question this assumption and suggest that repeats outside of annotated open reading frames may also trigger toxicity through a novel form of protein translational initiation known as repeat-associated non-AUG (RAN) translation. To date, RAN translation has been implicated in 4 nucleotide repeat expansion disorders: spinocerebellar ataxia type 8; myotonic dystrophy type 1 with CTG•CAG repeats; C9orf72 amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/frontotemporal dementia with GGGGCC•GGCCCC repeats; and fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome with CGG repeats. RAN translation contributes to hallmark pathological characteristics in these disorders by producing homopolymeric or dipeptide repeat proteins. Here, we review what is known about RAN translation, with an emphasis on how differences in both repeat sequence and context may confer different requirements for unconventional initiation. We then discuss how this new mechanism of translational initiation might function in normal physiology and lay out a roadmap for addressing the numerous questions that remain.

Indexed as

Peptide Chain Initiation, TranslationalDNA Repeat ExpansionHumansNeurodegenerative DiseasesOpen Reading Frames

Identifiers

PMID25005000
PMCPMC4391382
OpenAlexW2029472995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.