Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25004983›Full record

Trial reportTrials2014

Comparing the effect of a decision aid plus patient navigation with usual care on colorectal cancer screening completion in vulnerable populations: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Alison T Brenner, Christina M Getrich, Michael Pignone, Robert L Rhyne, Richard M Hoffman, Andrew McWilliams, Brisa Urquieta de Hernandez, Mark A Weaver, Hazel Tapp, Khalil Harbi and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02054598 (The CHOICES/OPCIONES Project), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02054598 nacompletednot on this map

The CHOICES/OPCIONES Project: Improving Colon Cancer Screening for Diverse Populations

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel HillRan2014 to 2016Enrolled265ConditionsColorectal CancerArmsDecision aid and navigation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Implementation of Coach McLungsBMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022
    Trial
  3. The Effects of the Nurse Navigation Program in Promoting Colorectal Cancer Screening Behaviors: a Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2020
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Alison T BrennerCecil Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 725 Martin Luther King Jr Boulevard, Campus Box 7590, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7590, USA. alison.brenner@unc.edu.
Christina M Getrich
Michael Pignone
Robert L Rhyne
Richard M Hoffman
Andrew McWilliams
Brisa Urquieta de Hernandez
Mark A Weaver
Hazel Tapp
Khalil Harbi
Daniel Reuland
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USCarolinas Healthcare System · USNew Mexico Cancer Center · USUniversity of Maryland, College Park · USUniversity of New Mexico · US

Funding

North Carolina Translational & Clinical Sciences Institute (NC TraCS)UL1TR001111 · NCATS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BUSE, JOHN BERNARD, CAREY, TIMOTHY S · 2013 to 2017
$43.9M
University of New Mexico Clinical and Translational Science CenterUL1TR000041 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI LARSON, RICHARD S · 2012 to 2014
$9.8M
MARYLAND POPULATION RESEARCH CENTERR24HD041041 · NICHD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI RENDALL, MICHAEL S. · 2001 to 2016
$6.6M
NCATS NIH HHS 1UL1TR001111NCATS NIH HHS 1UL1TR001111-01NCATS NIH HHS 8UL1TR000041NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001111NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD041041PHS HHS 5-T32HSHS000032
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundScreening can reduce colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality. However, screening is underutilized in vulnerable patient populations, particularly among Latinos. Patient-directed decision aids can increase CRC screening knowledge, self-efficacy, and intent; however, their effect on actual screening test completion tends to be modest. This is probably because decision aids do not address some of the patient-specific barriers that prevent successful completion of CRC screening in these populations. These individual barriers might be addressed though patient navigation interventions. This study will test a combined decision aid and patient navigator intervention on screening completion in diverse populations of vulnerable primary care patients. METHODS/

designWe will conduct a multisite, randomized controlled trial with patient-level randomization. Planned enrollment is 300 patients aged 50 to 75 years at average CRC risk presenting for appointments at two primary clinics in North Carolina and New Mexico. Intervention participants will view a video decision aid immediately before the clinic visit. The 14 to 16 minute video presents information about fecal occult blood tests and colonoscopy and will be viewed on a portable computer tablet in English or Spanish. Clinic-based patient navigators are bilingual and bicultural and will provide both face-to-face and telephone-based navigation. Control participants will view an unrelated food safety video and receive usual care. The primary outcome is completion of a CRC screening test at six months. Planned subgroup analyses include examining intervention effectiveness in Latinos, who will be oversampled. Secondarily, the trial will evaluate the intervention effects on knowledge of CRC screening, self-efficacy, intent, and patient-provider communication. The study will also examine whether patient ethnicity, acculturation, language preference, or health insurance status moderate the intervention effect on CRC screening. DISCUSSION: This pragmatic randomized controlled trial will test a combined decision aid and patient navigator intervention targeting CRC screening completion. Findings from this trial may inform future interventions and implementation policies designed to promote CRC screening in vulnerable patient populations and to reduce screening disparities. CLINICAL

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02054598.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesPatient NavigationResearch DesignAcculturationAgedClinical ProtocolsColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHispanic or LatinoHumansInsurance CoverageInsurance, HealthLanguage

Identifiers

PMID25004983
PMCPMC4100055
OpenAlexW2111357045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.