Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25004980›Full record

ArticleActa crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography2014

BuD, a helix-loop-helix DNA-binding domain for genome modification.

Stefano Stella, Rafael Molina, Blanca López-Méndez, Alexandre Juillerat, Claudia Bertonati, Fayza Daboussi, Ramon Campos-Olivas, Phillippe Duchateau, Guillermo Montoya

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. A TAL effector-like protein of an endofungal bacterium increases the stress tolerance and alters the transcriptome of the host.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Applications of Alternative Nucleases in the Age of CRISPR/Cas9.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Genome engineering: Drosophila melanogaster and beyond.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Developmental biology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Stefano StellaMacromolecular Crystallography Group, Structural Biology and Biocomputing Programme, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Calle de Melchor Fernández Almagro 3, 28029 Madrid, Spain.
Rafael MolinaMacromolecular Crystallography Group, Structural Biology and Biocomputing Programme, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Calle de Melchor Fernández Almagro 3, 28029 Madrid, Spain.
Blanca López-MéndezSpectroscopy and NMR Unit, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Calle de Melchor Fernández Almagro 3, 28029 Madrid, Spain.
Alexandre JuilleratCellectis, 8 Rue de la Croix Jarry, 75013 Paris, France.
Claudia BertonatiCellectis, 8 Rue de la Croix Jarry, 75013 Paris, France.
Fayza DaboussiCellectis, 8 Rue de la Croix Jarry, 75013 Paris, France.
Ramon Campos-OlivasSpectroscopy and NMR Unit, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Calle de Melchor Fernández Almagro 3, 28029 Madrid, Spain.
Phillippe DuchateauCellectis, 8 Rue de la Croix Jarry, 75013 Paris, France.
Guillermo MontoyaMacromolecular Crystallography Group, Structural Biology and Biocomputing Programme, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Calle de Melchor Fernández Almagro 3, 28029 Madrid, Spain.
Spanish National Cancer Research Centre · ESEuropean Theoretical Spectroscopy Facility · BEInstitute of Crystallography · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA editing offers new possibilities in synthetic biology and biomedicine for modulation or modification of cellular functions to organisms. However, inaccuracy in this process may lead to genome damage. To address this important problem, a strategy allowing specific gene modification has been achieved through the addition, removal or exchange of DNA sequences using customized proteins and the endogenous DNA-repair machinery. Therefore, the engineering of specific protein-DNA interactions in protein scaffolds is key to providing `toolkits' for precise genome modification or regulation of gene expression. In a search for putative DNA-binding domains, BurrH, a protein that recognizes a 19 bp DNA target, was identified. Here, its apo and DNA-bound crystal structures are reported, revealing a central region containing 19 repeats of a helix-loop-helix modular domain (BurrH domain; BuD), which identifies the DNA target by a single residue-to-nucleotide code, thus facilitating its redesign for gene targeting. New DNA-binding specificities have been engineered in this template, showing that BuD-derived nucleases (BuDNs) induce high levels of gene targeting in a locus of the human haemoglobin β (HBB) gene close to mutations responsible for sickle-cell anaemia. Hence, the unique combination of high efficiency and specificity of the BuD arrays can push forward diverse genome-modification approaches for cell or organism redesign, opening new avenues for gene editing.

Indexed as

GenomeHelix-Loop-Helix MotifsCalorimetryCrystallography, X-RayDNAHumansDNAgene targetinggeneticsprotein–DNA interaction

Identifiers

PMID25004980
PMCPMC4089491
OpenAlexW2086138762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.